Now we are in USA and we need to study United States history not India.
According to a different source, this question refers to the article "Looters Leave Nothing Behind in Storm’s Wake" by Mike Perlstein and Brian Thevenot.
This article narrates the events that took place in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. The article tells us that looting and chaos took over the city, but that policemen did nothing to contain this. Moreover, we learn that some policemen even joined in on the looting.
The police officers justified not stopping the looters by arguing that there was nothing they could do to stop their actions, as they could communicate with their superiors. The authors state that:
<em>"Officers claimed there was nothing they could do to contain the anarchy, saying their radio communications had broken down and they had no direction from commanders."</em>
They also said that they did not have enough police officers to face the crowd, and that a mass riot would most likely break out if you tried to contain the people.
No, Boo Radley had a terrible family life and was effected emotionally by them. He had many rumors going around about him in May comb but most of them weren't real so people believed he was crazy but he was just actually misunderstood by Scout and the rest of May comb. :)
Answer:
doesn’t make sense
Explanation:
the sentence doesn’t make sense. ♀️
Answer:
In this case, in the polar opposite game of words " split, teeter, and
plunge; it is possible to appreciate a chain of events that lead the reader to think of a group of ice cubes splitting and falling into the water.
Explanation:
Polar opposites refers to the relationship of words to describe a concept that is on the contrary fo some other, in some cases this word group can be found in idioms such as the group of words presented in the question to show some kind of idea.
For example: North and South, Hot and Cold, Dry and Wet.