The correct answer is C. The author of passage 1 believes fish farming is beneficial to the environment, while the author of Passage 2 believes fish farming is not the solution to overfishing
Explanation:
The two passages provide a different about fish farming, which is the practice that involves raising fish rather than capturing them in their natural habitat. In the case of the passage 1, the author proposes fish farming is beneficial because this stops the problem of overfishing, this can be seen in "Fish farming helps humans continue to consume fish while protecting valuable marine resources" that shows fish farming is the way to protect the environment and the populations of fish while benefitting humans.
On the opposite, the author of passage 2 exposes the negative effects of fish farming and in this way shows this is not a solution. This can be seen in "one of the major problems with fish farming is water supply contamination" or in "it also causes destructions to habits" that supports the idea fishing farming does not solve the problems caused by overfishing.
Word of advice....when you want to get your homework questions answered, you should make it seem like you're asking out of curiosity, so put question marks and stuff haha :D
<span>Well you can divide it it into 4 aspects. </span>
<span>The most understood aspect of the 1st amendment is the freedom of speech. This allows people to express themselves, and the Supreme court must have justification to interfere with it. </span>
<span>The freedom of press is the same thing. It allows people to express themselves through the media and publications. </span>
<span>The right to assemble allows people to gather together, as long as it's peaceful and not harmful. The government can intervene if they see anything illegal happening. </span>
<span>The right to petition guarantees that any wrong doing from the government or courts can be fought, allowing people to work together to make change. </span>
No the sky is not truly blue as it is just the reflection of the ocean. If there was no ocean then there wouldn't be a blue sky.
Observations (what you see that is important for a possible future inference) 1. Heard a siren 2: Smelled smoke
Inferences: Kristens house catches on fire and turns off the fire alarm.
Although American Indian soldiers had effectively used their languages to create and transmit secret messages during World War I, military leaders were reluctant to use the code a second time, fearing that it would no longer be effective. The Japanese and German governments had sent students to the United States specifically to learn certain American Indian languages. The Navajo language, however, was so complex that few people outside the Navajo Nation itself could speak it. In 1942, it was estimated that only thirty non-Navajos spoke the language worldwide.
