C.) is the correct use of "who's." "Who's" is a contraction of who and is. In each sentence, instead of saying who's, say who is.
(ex. "Who is turn is it..." doesn't sound right.).
The other three sentences are incorrect; they need "whose" instead which is a <span>determiner or pronoun showing possession. </span>
Answer:
Option "C" is correct
Explanation:
Although we were impressed with your application, we have no positions available at this time.
The statement depicts that the situation hass been decided even before the current circumstances.
To evaluate an argument you should basically ask yourself if the point of view of the author is valid or not. Follow these steps to answer your question.
- Is the argument good or bad? Do you agree? Why?
- How would the past of the author impact the validity of what they are saying?
- What is the author trying to say about the issue in the argument?
- Find grammatical errors.
Good luck
Note: I found this question online and saw that the italicized words are "speculate", "strenuous", "exaggerate", and "vicinity".
Answer:
The sentence that best uses a synonym as a context clue to clarify the meaning of the word is option D. I know I left my laptop in the vicinity of the playing field, which is near the bleachers.
Explanation:
Options A through C do not present any context clues to clarify the meaning of the italicized words. The only possible option left is D, in which we have the word "vicinity". "Vicinity" means the area near or around something. In the sentence, we have the very synonym of "vicinity" being used as a context clue for its meaning when the speaker says, "which is near the bleachers." Therefore, even if the reader does not know what "vicinity" means, he can infer the meaning through the context clue.
