Explanation: The Boston Massacre was different from the Revolutionary War because the war had actual battles whereas the Boston Massacre wasn't a battle, it was started because of a brawl between a British officer, it was merely a beating. The colonists were in the wrong and shouldn't have been harassing the Redcoats but the British should not have fired into a crowd of unarmed men and boys after they "supposedly" heard the word fire and killed five men and wounded six.
They should interview other people who fought in that same war ( which would be back up witness for these two different accounts). So whoever has the most back up witnesses must be telling the truth ( also make sure the other people you interview don't know they are back up witness).
King => Nobles => Free citizens => Soldiers/Civil Service => Slaves.
Three main social classes included the awilu (free persons), the wardu (slaves), and the mushkenu (free persons of low estate).
As a punishment, free persons could be forced into slavery. Parents of children could also be sold into slavery.
Babylonians based the structure of their society around their own religious beliefs and how they will prosper. They were ruthless people who conquered many nations through force. Some accounts even state that the Babylonians would kill entire civilizations, even if the civilization had surrendered without any sort of resistance.
