Answer:
Break-even point in composite units = 811 units
Explanation:
Number of modal;
5 Youth models
9 Adult models
6 Recreational models
Annual fixed costs total = $6,550,000
Find:
Break-even point in composite units
Computation:
Mixed contribution margin = 5[130] + 9[475] + 6[525]
Mixed contribution margin = 650 + 4275 + 3150
Mixed contribution margin = $8075
Break-even point in composite units = Annual fixed costs total / Mixed contribution margin
Break-even point in composite units = 6,550,000 / 8075
Break-even point in composite units = 811 units
Answer: The expected loss is $2.3
Explanation:
Total number of tickets to be sold = 100 tickets
one $450 prize, the expected gain = 450 x (1/100) = $4.5
two $110 prizes, the expected gain = 110 x (2/100) = $2.2
four $25 prizes. the expected gain = 25 x (4/100) = $1
Expected gain (loss) = Total expected gain - Cost of the ticket
= (4.5 + 2.2 + 1 ) - 10
= (2.3)
The expected loss is $2.3
If you want to make sure it's interesting, you have to cater your speech/talk to your target audience. This is good advice. A 15-page detailed Powerpoint presentation with note cards would do as much good when presenting to kindergarteners as a water hose would do good in a flood. But, say, it was a fire, then the water hose might come in handy. In our case, your boss at the business meeting would find your Powerpoint much more interesting than kindergarteners would.
Hope this helps! Have a nice day :)
Increase in price leads to a decrease in supply.
M1 money growth in the US was about 16% in 2008, 7% in 2009 and 9% in 2010. Over the same time period, the yield on 3-month Treasury bills fell from almost 3% to close to 0%. Given these high rates of money growth, why did interest rates fall, rather than increase? What does this say about the income, price level and expected-inflation effects?
Higher money growth (increase in the money supply) should have the following effects:
Liquidity effect indicates that this growth in money should shift money supply to the right, which should decrease the interest rate.
Income effect indicates that the growth in money should increase income levels, which should increase the demand for money and shift the demand curve to the right. This should increase the interest rate.
The price level effect indicates that the growth in money should increase price levels, which should increase the demand for money and shift the demand curve to the right. This should also increase the interest rate.
During this time period, unemployment was high, economic growth was weak and policymakers were more concerned with deflation than they were with inflation.
Therefore, the expected inflation effect was almost non-existent (due to the concerns with deflation) and the liquidity effect dominated all other effects, which made interest rates fall.
<span>This is illustrated with the first graph on slide 32 of the Theory of Money Powerpoints.</span>
