Answer:
Liberty, in philosophy, involves free will as contrasted with determinism.[1] In politics, liberty consists of the social and political freedoms to which all community members are entitled. In theology, liberty is freedom from the effects of "sin, spiritual servitude, [or] worldly ties.
Generally, liberty is distinctly differentiated from freedom in that freedom is primarily, if not exclusively, the ability to do as one wills and what one has the power to do; whereas liberty concerns the absence of arbitrary restraints and takes into account the rights of all involved. As such, the exercise of liberty is subject to capability and limited by the rights of others.
hope this helps! :)
Answer:
What's the question?
Explanation:
I got the first half, but nothing else.
League of Nations aimed to prevent war by using collective security and demilitarization. t<span>he U.S. Senate did not ratify the Treaty of Versailles, which especially lots meant that united states of america of america in no way joined the League of international locations. Plus, the Senate rejected President Wilson's alliances with super Britain and France. All in all, Wilson could not do something without the Senate's consent. i'm uncertain if Wilson and the Senate had the comparable view on the Treaty of Versailles, yet i understand that the U.S. had to compromise with super Britain and France because of the fact those 2 international locations had to rid Germany of each and every thing as revenge.</span>
The event that sparked the beginning of the conflict between Hamilton and Jefferson is that Hamilton wanted a strong federal government. He believed in a centralized federal government with strong power.