Answer:
irst supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1]
Explanation:
The United States involvement in the Mexican Revolution was varied and seemingly contradictory, first supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1] For both economic and political reasons, the U.S. government generally supported those who occupied the seats of power, whether they held that power legitimately or not. A clear exception was the French Intervention in Mexico, when the U.S. supported the beleaguered liberal government of Benito Juárez at the time of the American Civil War (1861-1865). Prior to Woodrow Wilson's inauguration on March 4, 1913, the U.S. Government focused on just warning the Mexican military that decisive action from the U.S. military would take place if lives and property of U.S. nationals living in the country were endangered.[2] President William Howard Taft sent more troops to the US-Mexico border but did not allow them to intervene in the conflict,[3][4] a move which Congress opposed.[4] Twice during the Revolution, the U.S. sent troops into Mexico.
<span>It allowed the north to open their eyes and listen to the pleas of the African Americans. It worked against the movement by civil rights opponents charging this racial integration as "communistic
</span>
It says that it was Catholicism and Mormonism
Answer:
I mean it's supposed to be your opinion, but...
The Declaration of Independence has stated all men are free and equal, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 says that all persons must be treated equally without regard to their race, color, or national origin. Racial profiling clearly violates these laws, as law enforcement treat certain people as criminals or dangerous simply because of their race or skin color. Systemic racism has taught law enforcement officers that this is acceptable, even though it fails to comply with the law.
Hope this helped.
Answer:
I don't know sorry in which subject is this
