Doesn’t make sense to me srry
a) Proof by contradiction is different from traditional proof as it accepts a single example showing that a statement is false, instead of having the need to derive a general relationship for all input values.
b) The statement is true by contradiction as the sum of the measures is of 160º, and not 180º.
<h3>What are supplementary angles?</h3>
Two angles are called supplementary angles if the sum of their measures has a value of 180º.
The measures of the angles in this problem are given as follows:
Then the sum of the measures of this angles is given as follows:
90 + 70 = 160º.
Which is a different sum of 160º, confirming the statement that the angles are not supplementary by contradiction.
A similar problem, involving proof by contradiction and supplementary angles, is presented at brainly.com/question/28889480
#SPJ1
There are 16 ounces in one pound. So we do 7 divided by 16 to get our answer.
7 / 16 = 0.4375 ≈ 0.4 lbs
7 oz is approximately 0.4 lbs.
Answer:
The width of the building is 50 lamps and 60 lamps will be needed.
Step-by-step explanation:
The perimeter is computed by the sum of the sides of the building, since the length and width are equal on the oposite sides of the building, the perimeter is given by:
perimeter = 2*length + 2*width
900 = 2*(400) + 2*width
2*width + 800 = 900
2*width = 900 - 800
2*width = 100
width = 100/2 = 50 feets
To know how many lights bulbs will be needed we need to take the perimeter of the building and divide it by the space between the lamps. We have:
number o lamps = 900/15 = 60 lamps
Answer/Step-by-step explanation:
3:2 = 6:4 = 15:10
<u>Check work:</u>
3 ÷ 2 = 1.5
6 ÷ 4 = 1.5
15 ÷ 10 = 1.5
