Answer:
she didnt really
Explanation:
it took a whole community, not one person :/
Answer:
On March 6, 1836, after 13 days of intermittent fighting, the Battle of the Alamo comes to a gruesome end, capping off a pivotal moment in the Texas Revolution. Mexican forces were victorious in recapturing the fort, and nearly all of the roughly 200 Texan defenders—including frontiersman Davy Crockett—died.
Explanation:
There are many important actions taken by Washington together with the first congress, but we'll provide you with three of them as the question requests so: 1. Passing the first ten Amendments of the Constitution (Bill of Rights). There weren't proper constitutional provisions protecting the citizens' rights and liberties until the actual ratification of these 10 first Amendments in Dec 15, 1791; it was through the efforts of Madison, Washington and the First Congress that they came to be. 2. Planning the building of the first centralized US Bank. In order to establish financial order and security in the newly formed United States, the Secretary of Treasury Hamilton was given the lead position in building the "First Bank of the United States"; a supported and successful project by Washington and the First Congress. 3. Setting up the court system and precedents. The First Congress was responsible of applying and establishing further details of a new juridical system, as explained in the Judiciary Act 1789; it mainly established a Supreme Court, with inferior courts, too, based on precedents (previously decided cases as reliable basis).
Read more on Brainly -
brainly.com/sf/question/1653394
Casualty rates at the Battle of Okinawa and Iwo Jima plays a small role in the justification of dropping the atomic bomb, and is by no means the only justification or even the major justification in using the atomic bomb. They were, after all, only used as a statistical report through the casualty per sq. mile report of what can occur when invading the mainland. So yes, it may be a means towards the justification, but as the justification itself it is not.
~
Answer:
<h3>If only one person has the authority to rule, then no one else, even members of government, may have authority, so divine right undermines civil society.</h3><h3 />
Explanation:
- The statement that best explains an enlightenment position on the divine right to rule is "If only one person has the authority to rule, then no one else, even members of government, may have authority, so divine right undermines civil society."
- If we look from an enlightenment position, authority and power should be derived from reason as it does not believe in divine right theory of power and legitimacy.
- It believes that rights and liberties of the people are infringed upon and other forms of rational democratic processes are undermined when only one person takes control over the whole power.
