Preventing genocide is one of the greatest challenges facing the international community.[1]<span> Aside from the suffering and grief inflicted upon generations of people and the catastrophic social, economic and political dislocations that follow, this ‘crime of crimes’ has the potential to destabilize entire regions for decades (Bosco, 2005). The shockwaves of Rwanda’s genocide are still felt in the eastern parts of the Democratic Republic of Congo nearly 20 years later, for example. Considerable resources are now devoted to the task of preventing genocide. In 2004 the United Nations established the Office of the Special Advisor on the Prevention of Genocide with the purpose to ‘raise awareness of the causes and dynamics of genocide, to alert relevant actors where there is a risk of genocide, and to advocate and mobilize for appropriate action’ (UN 2012). At the 2005 World Summit governments pledged that where states were ‘manifestly failing’ to protect their populations from ‘war crimes, genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity’ the international community could step in a protect those populations itself (UN, 2012). The ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) project, designed to move the concept of state sovereignty away from an absolute right of non-intervention to a moral charge of shielding the welfare of domestic populations, is now embedded in international law (Evans 2008). Just this year, the United States government has stated that ‘preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States,’ and that ‘President Obama has made the prevention of atrocities a key focus of this Administration’s foreign policy’ (Auschwitz Institute, 2012). Numerous scholars and non-government organisations have similarly made preventing genocide their primary focus (Albright and Cohen, 2008; Genocide Watch, 2012).</span>
Answer:
Not really
Explanation:
1) I am a Christian meaning I am not religious I am in a relationship with Jesus who is closer and dearer than a brother.
2) Science rather proves my "religion"
3) If you say that all humans come from chimps where did chimps come from?
4) I am not against science
5) Science proves EVERYTHING I believe
6) And for the things that we do not know or can't see " faith. is the evidence of the unseen"
7) We do not see the whole universe but we believe it is there. This is faith
8) Religous believers are Buddhists etc..
9) This is why many Christians, Jews, and Messianic Jews support science
10) Some things said in science do not make sense. Big Bang Theory: where did the first star come from.
11) If God decided to lift a finger Everything would fall apart
12) You can continue living as you want but I know my God is in control and has all power.
Thank you
B.) The exchange of goods led to cultural exchanges. Take the silk road for example. Trades led to religious diffusion and new cultures.
Answer:
Anti-Federalists, attacked
Loyalists, attacked
Explanation:
For further use:
Federalists, supported
Tories, attacked
Whigs, supported
