<u>This portion of the text shows Hobbes supported an absolute ruler:</u>
- <em>Men are continually in competition for honour and dignity . . . and consequently amongst men there ariseth on that ground, envy, and hatred, and finally war. ... No wonder if there be somewhat else required, besides [contract], to make their agreement constant and lasting; which is a common power to keep them in awe and to direct their actions to the common benefit.
</em>
- <em>
The only way to erect such a common power, as may be able to defend them from the invasion of foreigners, and the injuries of one another . . . is to confer all their power and strength upon one man, or upon one assembly of men, that may reduce all their wills, by plurality of voices, unto one will.</em>
Further detail:
Thomas Hobbes published a famous work called Leviathan in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes' view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). Hobbes' view of the natural state of human beings without a government held that people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. And so people willingly enter a "social contract" in which they live under a government that provides stability and security for society.
If you're taking the connexus one heres the answers ;]
1. D(Negros have fought and died for this country)
2.C(women are left out of the political process)
3.B(the civil rights act of 1964)
4.C(these are border states that see larger numbers of immigrants)
5.A(the united states has an ethnically diverse population)
6.B & C(the DREAM act proposes support for undocumented youth to attend college & the immigration act of 1990 increased the number of permanent visas granted)
7.A & D (avoids participation in criminal activity& displays tolerance for different opinions)
8. D(being elected to political office)
9.A B or C(multiple perspectives and diverse experiences, passionate and active citizens & recognising the gap between ideals and practices)
10. C(immigration)
11. A (immigrants often come in search of economic improvement)
Good luck!!!!! ✌
<span><span>The Safavid and Ottoman dynasties were both of Turkish ethnicity. The Safavid empire extended from the Caucasia ( Armenia, Azeribijan, etc.) to India, Iraq, the Persian Gulf, and parts of central Asia and the Caspian Sea.The Ottoman empire, on the other hand, ruled the the rest of the Islamic empire (Middle East, Balkans, and North Africa).
The Ottoman empire was older and stronger than the young Safavid empire, but the Ottomans were alarmed as the Safavid strength and influence grew and felt their interest was threatened. Moreover, the Safavid followed Shia Islam, while the Ottoman people were followers of Sunni/Sufi Islam.
But the main reasons for the conflict are rather political than for sectarian religious factors as many try to force this idea of Sunni/Shia conflict.
As the Safavid empire grew, it pushed its territories as far as Iraq and eastern Turkey, carving for itself a considerable chunk of Ottoman territory. This was the point when the Ottomans felt in danger and waged war on their cousins the Safavid.</span><span>
</span></span>
Cartels, monopolies, trusts, and horizontal and vertical integration all share the goal of increasing profits. The step by the federal government to limit the power of corporations is the Sherman Antitrust Act. The argument that supports the perception of the big business leaders as "captains of industry" is that the support for technology benefits the economy.
The correct answer is They believed that immigrants were inferior to individuals born in the United States.
Nativism is a term that refers to a belief system in which individuals born in a specific country feel that they are better than individuals who were born elsewhere and moved to this country. This idea is usually rooted in fear during American history, as many nativists fear that immigrants will take jobs from native born American citizens. Nativism is a constant theme in American history, especially during the middle of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century.
