This is an example or description of "a<span>rgument against the person, abusive".</span>
It is a wrong
argumentative methodology whereby original discourse of the current subject is dodged
by rather assaulting the character, intention, or other quality of the
individual making the contention, or people related with the contention, as
opposed to countering the substance of the contention itself. Usually known as “Ad
hominem”.
The benifits are that congress can full fill their powers that allow them to manage our country.
People can not change unless THEY want to. People may say, "I wish I could do this, or I wanna do that, or I wanna stop doing this." What they fail to realize is that they will get no where in life until THEY make decisions for themselves. Stay strong!
Answer:
Cognitive dissonance.
Explanation:
Based on this scenario, Sam is experiencing <em>cognitive dissonance</em>. Cognitive dissonance describes Sam's feelings regarding Joann. He really likes her but he is not sure to be with her in a long-term relationship, because there is a conflict between two aspects of his feelings for her and his political ideas that are so different. People try to be consistent, and when what they believe to be true is in danger they feel cognitive dissonance, which will be tried to be reduced.