Answer:
Natural monopoly
Explanation:
A natural monopoly refers to a type of monopoly that occurs when the start-up costs or infrastructural costs are high or economies of scale in an industry are very powerful in such a way that only the largest supplier in the industry which is usually the first supplier in the market has a great advantage over potential competitors and therefore becomes the only supplier in the industry.
On the long-run average cost (LRAC) curve, a natural monopoly exists when the quantity demanded is less than the minimum quantity that is required to be at the bottom of the LRAC curve.
Therefore, a <u>natural monopoly</u> exists when the quantity demanded in the market is less than the quantity at the bottom of the long-run average cost curve.
Answer:
Letter b is correct.<u> If several competitors pursue similar differentiation tactics, they may all be perceived as equals in the mind of the consumer.</u>
Explanation:
This statement is the most appropriate to answer this question about competitive advantages, because a competitive advantage can be described as a certain advantage that an organization has in relation to its competitors. Some of these advantages may be greater access to raw materials, more qualified labor, barriers to entry, geographic location, differentiation of products and services, etc.
Therefore, when several competitors adopt similar differentiation tactics, the consumer does not have enough attributes to differentiate one brand from another, so all competitors can be perceived as equal in the consumer's mind.
Answer: Alienated follower
Explanation:
Alienated followers are independent and critical thinkers who participate not to the beam or fullness of their capacity in a group. Sophia is discouged by the inactiveness of her boss concerning her complians and this makes her to complain to anyone who may be willing to speak to him, this makes her a alienated follower.
Answer: The manufacturer, because the shoe store's revocation of its offer was too late.
Explanation:
Based on the scenario given in the question, if the store manager subsequently refuses the manufacturer's delivery on December 1, and thee manufacturer sues the shoe store for breach of contract, the manufacturer will prevail because the shoe store's revocation of its offer was too late.
According to the mailbox rule under the contract law, this is the default rule that's used to determine when an offer is considered to be accepted and when there's communication of the acceptance. In this case, the revocation is too late therefore the manufacturer will prevail.
