Answer:
3 basic rights.
1.Religious freedom
2. Freedom of speach
3. Freedom of the press
Explanation:
All of our rights even inalianable rights come with limits.
The only right that has no limits is the freedom of thought which is the same as religious freedom. You have the right to think and believe anything. But even that has restrictions on how you can act on your beliefs. Your religious beliefs are not a license to do anything related to that belief. You can't engage in human sacrifice as a ritual for the belief. You can't hide behind your religous beliefs as a sheild against prosecution for murder.
"Freedom of religion embraces two concepts, -freedom to believe and freedom to act. The first is absolute, but in the nature of things the second cannot be. ~ <em>Cantwell v Connecticut.</em>
<em />
The freedom of speach also has limits. You can say anything but you can't yell fire in a crowded theater. Doing so could cause a stampede and endanger the lives of others. Likewise, we have an impeachment case before the Senate right now in which the former president incited a riot at the Capital complex that caused the death of 6 people. The question before the Senate is did the former President incite a riot causing death and destruction of public property?
The freedom of the press is a first amendment right. But that doesn't give a publisher the right to slander or print falsehood about another person. The freedom of assembly is another 1st amendment right, but there is a difference between a lawful and peaceful assembly and a riot that results in the death of 5 people and the destruction of property.
Answer:
possessive Determinants
Explanation:
Given - The determinants that indicate who owns something or to whom it belongs are the:
Solution -
The determinants that indicate who owns something or to whom it belongs are possessive Determinants.
The determinants possessive tonics always go behind the name to which they refer and agree in gender and number with the noun to the that accompany it . Example : A friend of mine is coming today.
Answer:
able to be represented by a straight line on a graph; involving or exhibiting directly proportional change in two related quantities.
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes, against Sally only.
Explanation:
With the information given in the question, Ann´s lawsuit will not proceed after Donny´s defendant raise the defenses of limitations.
A statute of limitations looks to set a maximum time after which an event could be legally imported and a lawsuit against it will pass.
A statute of repose limits the time that an action could be brought back because of a particular event.
The bad things that happened to Ann were in 2018 so, for the car accident she had until 2020 to initiate a lawsuit.
On the other hand, the statute of repose began to run once the affected notice the problem that the particular event, in this case, the negligence from Sally, is caused. Ann noticed the pain on her elbow in 2020 so she had until 2030 to initiate a lawsuit.
I hope this answer helps you.
