Answer:
The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.
Explanation:
The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.
Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.
There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.
Answer:
The correct option is E.
Explanation:
That is, the US Supreme Court established that state governments can regulate private industries that affect the "common good" since grain storage facilities were dedicated to public use, therefore , their rates were subject to public regulation.
Answer: B
Explanation: Inspecting the car is not typically apart of determining whether or not someone is under the influence unless they have unreasonable doubt that the driver is under the influence of something and they need to find out what incase it isn't alcohol
Life sentence. Killing someone while driving is called vehicular homicide, while driving drunk is a DUI. The two together can lead to a life sentence, however, it varies greatly depending on the State and Nation.
I hope I've helped! :)
