Answer: single use plan
Explanation: In simple words,single use plan refers to the plan that is made for achieving a goal that will not repeat in future.
A program plan refers to the plan that an organisation makes with an objective of outlining the activities and events that the employees have to follow for achieving organisational goals.
Hence, from the above we can conclude that a program is a single use plan as it outlines activities for a specific project that needs to be performed.
Answer:
The correct option is E
Explanation:
The formula to compute the accounts receivable turnover of the company for the Year 2 is as:
Accounts Receivable Turnover = Net Credit Sales / Average Accounts Receivable
where
Net Credit Sales be $723,000
And
Average Accounts Receivable is computed as:
Average Accounts Receivable = Accounts receivable Year 1 + Accounts receivable Year 2 / 2
= $86,500 + $82,750 / 2
= $169,250 / 2
= $84,625
Putting the values in the above formula:
= $723,000 / $84,625
= 8.54
Answer:
(a) 9.9%
(b) 10.09%
The further explanation is given below.
Explanation:
The given values are:
Coupon payment
= $99
Price
= $1,000
(a)
The Yield to maturity (YTM) will be:
=
where,
C = Coupon payment
P = Price
n = years to maturity
F = Face value
On putting the estimated values is the above formula, we get
⇒
⇒
⇒ %
(b)
Although the 1st year coupon was indeed reinvested outside an interest rate of r%, cumulative money raised will indeed be made at the end of 2nd year.
=
Came to the realization compound YTM is therefore a function of r, as is shown throughout the table below:
Rate (r) Total proceeds Realized YTM ()
7.9% 1205.8 9.8%
9.9% 1207.8 9.9%
11.9% 1209.8 9.99%
Now,
Overall proceeds realized YTM:
=
=
=
=
=
=
= %
Did you mean diethyl dimethyl hexane?
If so then the iupac name for it is 3-Ethyl-2,2-dimethylhexane <span>[</span>
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.