1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
garri49 [273]
3 years ago
7

Definition of ludicrous

English
2 answers:
Snezhnost [94]3 years ago
5 0
<span>so foolish, unreasonable, or out of place as to be amusing; ridiculous</span>
IRISSAK [1]3 years ago
5 0
Foolish, Unreasonable, or Rediculous
You might be interested in
Which of the following is an example of a sentence fragment?
kupik [55]
The answer is: When he was done
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement is NOT true about sentence fragments? A. They do not have a subject, but they have a predicate. B. They do not h
GREYUIT [131]

The answer is D. Sometimes it can but most of the time you'll have no luck.

5 0
3 years ago
Can someone help me with this. Thank you.
Lady bird [3.3K]
Are we supposed to put the words in a sentence?
3 0
3 years ago
-Elie Wiesel. "The Perils of Indifference," 1999
postnew [5]

The rhetorical strategy that Wiesel is using in the passage is pathos.

<h3>What is rhetorical strategy?</h3>

It should be noted that a rhetorical strategy is the communication tool that's used in written or spoken text in order to affect the reader or listener in an intended manner.

In this case, the rhetorical strategy that Wiesel is using in the passage is pathos. This is the appeal to the emotion of the audience.

Here, Wiesel tried to persuade the audience by evoking certain emotions in order to make them feel the way that he wants them to feel.

It is used to make readers agree to a particular perspective. Therefore, the correct answer is pathos.

Learn more about rhetorical strategy on:

brainly.com/question/6796727

#SPJ1

Complete question:

What rhetorical strategy did Wiesel use in the perils of indifference?

5 0
2 years ago
A philosopher who only recognizes material existence (not mental or spiritual) could most accurately be called a(n)
Aloiza [94]
I think maybe materialist
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Read these sentences:
    6·2 answers
  • which supernatural element described In this passage helps build tension by foreshadowing future events
    10·2 answers
  • Teddy Roosevelt, for example kept a pet snake
    9·1 answer
  • What does the word isthmus mean and please use it in a sentence​
    14·2 answers
  • PLS HELP!!! CAN SOMEONE PLS WRITE ME A TWO PAGE (use ur best judgement on here) MADE UP FANTASY STORY??? AND IT HAS TO BE MADE U
    13·1 answer
  • Choose one of the following Enlightenment thinkers: John Locke, Montesquieu, Rousseau, Voltaire, Wollstonecraft, Madame Tencin,
    10·1 answer
  • Domestic trade and its type
    12·1 answer
  • What is 3 + 3 + 3? just wondering
    8·2 answers
  • What does the word crust help you visualize?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the origin of the word raconteur?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!