<u>Answer:
</u>
The state statutes would be the sources of law that the legal counsel would not need to consult.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The issue that the white house is concerned about is of direct national interest and has not much to do with the statutes of the states comprising the United States.
- Hence, in order to find a relevant interpretation, the counsel would most likely have to consult the federal statutes and international treaties associated with the issue.
Answer: The U.S. Constitution provides that Congress shall have the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the various states.
Explanation:
Answer:
While total utility measures the aggregate satisfaction an individual receives from the consumption of a specific quantity of a good or service, marginal utility is the satisfaction an individual receives from consuming one additional unit of a good or service.
Explanation:
laws banning marriages between people of different races
apex
Answer:
The trial court focus on presentation of the evidence and examination of the witnesses while appellate courts there are no any kind of witnesses.
Explanation:
In trial court, both sides of the groups present the evidence to show the version of them to the court of what happened. Most of evidence which are presented in trial court comes from the witnesses and exhibits.
On the other side, in appellate courts, witnesses are not there, and any kind of the evidence is not presented. In the appellate courts, lawyers simply argue the legal and the policy issues before judges.
