Mark Brainliest please
The discourse on language in education has taken the intelligentsia by storm in the wake of the Single National Curriculum (SNC). The polarisation between various points of view is so intense that a meaningful debate is impossible. It is intriguing why the supporters of English distort some issues beyond recognition. Hence here is another attempt to clarify issues.
First, it must be restated that the discussion is not whether children should learn English or a local language. Those who support the local languages as the medium of instruction have always added ‘and English must be taught as a foreign language’. I have yet to figure out why we are accused of pushing out English from our education system to make our children backwards and incapable of handling technology. It seems to imply that even if we are failing to teach English correctly it is fine so long as we stick to our mantra of English and English alone.
Answer:
The invasion of England by William of Normandy was not a historical influence during the Early Modern English Period.
Explanation:
At the time trade with other countries was thriving. Greek and Roman art flourished. Scientific discoveries started to happen. Caxton printed books so works could be produced quicker in several copies.
Answer: Maybe feeling the beat if there is one in the music
Explanation:
Answer:
b. She is prioritizing monetary gain over honesty.
Answer:
what are the major problems caused by the lack of human resources
