Answer:
When interviewers ask you questions about things you would have done differently at work, they want to gain insight into your job-related weaknesses. They may also be attempting to determine how you respond to failure, and whether you can identify and address your shortcomings proactively.
If you think about this question ahead of time, you won’t find yourself swallowing hard and struggling to find an answer during your interview. The best approach is to know how to “spin” your answer so you can demonstrate how you’ve reflected upon and learned from past experiences.
When you're preparing a response, reflect on your past work experiences and make a list of situations that didn't turn out the way you would have liked. Think about the actions you took (or didn’t take), and how they resulted in a less-than-ideal outcome. Identify similar scenarios you encountered again after those initial disappointments, but where you performed differently. What did you learn from the negative result, and what did you do to strengthen your ability to handle similar situations in the future?
1) The improvement which was done to the bolded section in the sentence to make it correct is : Repetitive words were replaced with synonyms and pronouns. As it shown in the example, there is no need to duplicate the subject 'father' as it is clear to which word the pronoun 'he' relates. We always try to enrich our speech, so it's better to say the same thing in synonymous form:hates is replaced with dislikes - all in all it sounds good, looks natural and preserves the meaning of the first sentence.
<span>2) The sentence which should be revised to eliminate redundancy is With a prediction of a deadly storm season, the alert system is needed immediately. A redundancy in a sentence is when something is repeated for no reason, when there is obvious detail that brings no sense and can be omitted. From the first sentence we know that sirens were needed, so there is no need to repeat that. </span>
<span>3) The statement which best describes how this sentence can be made more concise is : It has a phrase that can be converted to reduce wordiness. The phrase from which the sentence is started is quite long, and according to its meaning, there is a better (shorter) equivalent, which is 'if'. Now it is concise : If spy a tornado, go and seek shelter in a dark room that has no windows.</span>
Answer:
C. It is about action and contributing to the common good.
Explanation:
A. would not be it bc who is they?
B. would not be it bc nobody asks what service was about.
D. would not be it bc there is more to it than just teens giving produce to a soup kitchen.
Answer:
start the letter and continue writing it as if you were having a normal conversation with your friends.
if you want to know if your letter came out good. show the letter to an actual friend. That way he or she could tell you if it would sound like a real letter you would have written.
Explanation:
Leaders spend 90% of their day communicating
