An efficiency ratio known as the capital intensity ratio provides valuable insight into a company's financial situation.
Capital Intensity Ratio = Total Assets/Total Revenue
Return on assets = Net income/Total Assets
Total Assets = Net income/Return on Assets= $389,100/0.086
Total Revenue = Net income/Net Profit Margin = $389,100/0.028
Capital intensity ratio = ($389,100 /0.086) / ($389,100 / 0.028) =0.33
This ratio reveals how much capital or other resources a company has to have in order to make single dollar in sales. This ratio is the inverse of the asset turnover ratio, making it simple to calculate the capital intensity ratio if you already know the asset turnover ratio. For all capital-intensive firms, we require a good or higher capital intensity ratio. A company that invests a significant amount of capital in its manufacturing process is said to be capital-intensive. E.g., Power generating facilities. A company that has made significant investments in assets to generate income has a high capital intensity ratio (CIR). A company with a low CIR is able to produce larger revenues while owning fewer assets. As a result, businesses can use this ratio to modify their capital budgeting and planning.
Learn more about Capital Intensity Ratio here
brainly.com/question/14594640
#SPJ4
what's the question???????
The case filed by Gerwin against Baker will be null and void, as thee is no existence of any legal contract between the parties as such.
<h3>What is a legal contract?</h3>
A contract is said to be a legal one when the party who is presented with such an offer accepts on the terms and with a condition that the offer must be for legal activities.
In case when any of the criterion mentioned above are not followed by the offeror or the offeree, then in such case, any lawsuit filed against the plaintiff will be considered as null and void.
Hence, it can be concluded that there is no legal contract between Gerwin and Baker, and thus their cases are null and void.
Learn more about a legal contract here:
brainly.com/question/3208041
#SPJ1
Answer: $15,000 gift from Diana’s mother for the down payment of their new house
Explanation: under the US code 102- Gifts and other inheritances. Gross income does not include the value of property acquired by gift. Money given as gifts to purchase a property are not taxable.
An important part of taking meeting minutes is C. PAYING CLOSE AND CAREFUL ATTENTION.
A meeting minutes can be described as a log of chronological event within the meeting. It is a log wherein everything that happened during the meeting is noted. Like who led the meeting, the topics discussed, the questions raised and the answers given. It also records the plans for future discussions and resolutions reached during the meeting.