Answer:
Explanation:
The Proposed bargain or deal is supportive of the business visionaries instead of the financial backer(investor) since all the capital is coming from the financial backer and the investor will be receiving just only 25% for the bargain or deal while he faces all the challenges posed or loss of capital. The business visionaries are not placing in any of their own personal capital but only their idea. They likewise have a bigger say in the administration of the business and the financial backer has no power over the choice since he conveys just 25% votes. Consequently, it's not a good bargain or deal for the financial backer considering the risk-reward ratio.
The counter-offer will include raising a proposed equity percent rate to half (i.e 50%). In addition to that, the financial backer needs to demand another seat on the board with the goal that they have equivalent authority over the administration and its choices. The most reduced the financial backer can go down is equity of 40% stake.
A. <span>making at least the minimum payment, even if they are late</span>
Answer:
The answer is: A) strategic alliance
Explanation:
A strategic alliance is an agreement between two or more independent companies to participate in a mutually beneficial project. The companies share resources for this specific project while remaining independent in all their other business activities.
This is usually done to try to enter a new market or to develop a new product.
Answer:
c. reserves increase by $100 million and the money supply increases by more than $100 million
Explanation:
Based on the information given in a situation where a FRACTIONAL-RESERVE BANKING SYSTEM has no availability of EXCESS RESERVES and no CURRENCY HOLDINGS, which means that if the central bank buys BONDS that worth $100 million, the RESERVES will tend to INCREASE by the amount of $100 million while the MONEY SUPPLY on the other hand will INCREASES by more than $100 million.
Answer:
165 / 130
165 /25
divide and get your answer
