The book is called "Island of The Blue Dolphins" and the author is called Scott O'Dell
Hesitant on moral grounds to<span> kill so many, </span>Crusoe<span> reasons that since </span>Friday<span> belongs </span>to<span> an enemy nation, the situation </span>can<span> be construed as a state of war in which </span>killing<span> is permissible.
</span>
Crusoe and Friday fall upon the cannibals and quickly overcome them with their superior weapons, allowing only four to escape.
Answer:
<u>Wow!</u> What a wonderful view.
Explanation:
An interjection is a word (usually a short one) used to show a sudden or spontaneous expression of emotion or feeling (like fear, surprise, disgust, hesitation), or to give a brief order. Examples of interjections are <em>Shh!, Wow!, Oh!, Boo, Oops, Ouch! Ew!, Uh, Um; </em>some adjectives such as<em> Good!, Cool!, Sweet! </em>and some greetings like<em> hey, bye </em>and<em> hi. </em>
Example of a sentence using a properly punctuated interjection:
<u>Wow!</u> What a wonderful view.
In this sentence, <em>Wow!</em> is an interjection, with no particular grammatical relation to the sentence, that is used to express surprise. It is also properly punctuated with an exclamation point as exclamation points are used with phrases and interjections showing surprise, excitement, or anger.
Answer:
????? because they diedieide
Explanation:
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
