Answer:
The following traits have been incorporated into early theories of state development as causes, when in reality they are often consequences:
<u>Craft specialization, irrigation, Warfare. technology, and trade.</u>
<u></u>
Explanation:
Warfare has been a consequence of the development of the state because it is a respond to how a state want to expand itself,gain more political and economic power.
Technology has been growing even more since Industrial Revolution. It has been developing from the productions of handcraft, agriculture methods to even more an more developed technology.
Irrigation was one of the first discovery of early societys in Egypt for example, this was a first step towards a more complex technology. But is was already a consequence of the creation of a state.
Trade was a consequence of people wanting to have a more organize way of distribution and exchange of goods. As a consequence technology was also developed.
The answer is B established sate government
Answer:
Railroads
Explanation:
Unlike airplanes and other forms of road transportation that their routes can be altered, have shortcuts, and other routes, railroads are fixed to the ground during construction and hence cannot be altered, hence they operate on fixed routes. Also railroads operate on fixed schedules, except for cases of delays, which seldom happens.
Answer:
C)
Explanation: I have found the rest of your question.
We had to avoid wounding Austria too severely; we had to avoid leaving behind in her any unnecessary bitterness of feeling or desire for revenge; we ought rather to reserve the possibility of becoming friends again with our adversary of the moment, and in any case to regard the Austrian state as a piece on the European chessboard. If Austria were severely injured, she would become the ally of France and of every other opponent of ours; she would even sacrifice her anti-Russian interests for the sake of revenge on Prussia. . . . The acquisition of provinces like Austria Silesia and portions of Bohemia could not strengthen the Prussian state; it would not lead to an amalgamation of German Austria with Prussia, and Vienna could not be governed from Berlin as a mere dependency. . . . Austria's conflict and rivalry with us was no more culpable than ours with her; our task was the establishment or foundation of German national unity under the leadership of the King of Prussia.
Which argument is Otto von Bismarck making in this excerpt?
A. He is insisting that German unification should be the force that unites all German speakers in Europe.
B. He is offering to defend German Austria from Bohemian nationalism in the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
C. He is rejecting the idea that German Austria should be made a part of a future united Germany.
D. He is warning the Prussian king not to go to war with Austria over Russian territory.
- The answer is C because his argument at the beginning is saying that they should avoid wounding Austria too harsh because if Austria were injured then she will become the ally of France and his rival and that they will tend to revenge and conflicts of the Prussian state and that will not lead to an amalgamation.