Answer:
They believed Yahweh to be the only true God, the god of Israel, and considered Jesus to be the messiah (Christ), as prophesied in the Jewish scriptures, which they held to be authoritative and sacred. They held faithfully to the Torah, including acceptance of Gentile converts based on a version of the Noachide laws.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. Jack is making a(n) <u>internal attribution</u> about his girlfriend's behavior, whereas John is making a(n) <u>external attribution</u>.
Explanation:
An internal attribution refers to a situation in which <u>an individual uses a personal reason to explain the outcome of a situation</u>. For example, a specific behavior is the result of the person's personality.
On the other hand, an external attribution refers to the situation when <u>the individual attributes a result to an external situation or environmental factor</u>, not to the person's characteristics. For example, when you fail an exam and you blame an external factor, such as the teacher or the weather.
In this case, <u>Jack is making an internal attribution</u> about his girlfriend's behavior because he thinks she broke up with him because she is selfish; whereas <u>John is making an external attribution</u> because he thinks his girlfriend broke up with him because she had a family emergency to attend.
Answer: False
Explanation: The statement in the question describes Stimulus Equivalence.
Contingency Adduction occurs when an individual acquires a new behaviour through conditioning and another contingency adds it to its own range of behaviors.
Stimulus equivalence on the other hand is when more than one different stimuli get the same response. Similar to the response in a situation where conditioning did not take place, although the response is accurate, it has not been reinforced.
Answer:
Insight #1: Asia’s consumers know what they want, and they want it now
Asian consumers make decisions quickly. In Vietnam and Thailand, 97% of smartphone users say that online research has contributed to them making purchase decisions more quickly now than they did a few years ago And consumers’ decisions aren’t just faster, they’re also better informed. A staggering 96% of smartphone users in India say that, thanks to online research, they’re making more informed purchase decisions than a few years ago. This is compared to just 59% of people in the U.S. who feel the same Insight #2: In Asia, brand loyalty is built moment-by-moment
Asia Pacific’s mobile-first consumers are open to new brands, which is exciting news for marketers. The key is being there. In Japan, 96% of smartphone users said they aren’t absolutely certain of the specific brand they want to buy when they begin looking for information online,When consumers start searching, they’re all ears.
Even when consumers do have a particular brand in mind, seeing the right information at the right time can make them change their decision. We found that 80% of smartphone users in Hong Kong have actually purchased a brand they wouldn’t normally consider because of relevant information shown to them on their smartphones in those moments. By contrast, only 1 in 3 of U.S. consumers say this.
Marketer takeaway: Be there. Asia Pacific consumers are open to brands across all stages of the consumer journey, but they can’t choose you if you aren’t there. It’s simple: commit to being there in consumers’ moments of need by showing up in category-relevant searches on mobile.
Explanation:
