1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DerKrebs [107]
3 years ago
13

8. How has ISIL contributed to ongoing violence in Iraq and Syria?

History
1 answer:
Nat2105 [25]3 years ago
6 0
D,E,C
----------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                  
You might be interested in
Which American nation became independent without war?
serg [7]

Answer:

Colombia

Explanation:

After the war, Cuba became a US protectorate and was granted independence in 1902.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
2. How did science help Carnegie transform<br> American industry?
valkas [14]

Answer:

Steel empire produces the raw materials

Explanation:

Andrew Carnegie was America's participant in the Industrial Revolution, as he produced the steel to make machinery and transportation possible throughout the nation.

7 0
3 years ago
The development of the hydrogen bomb by the united states and the u.s.s.r. was one result of
kap26 [50]
It is A. The cold war rivalry between the two nations in the 1950s because both feared that one would bomb the other leading to the end of the world.<span />
6 0
3 years ago
How were Simon bolivar and Jose de San Martin similar
Butoxors [25]

José de San Martín vs. Simón Bolívar

José de San Martín, 1778-1850, and Simon Bolívar, 1783-1830, were two of the primary causes of independence of countries from colonial powers in Latin America. Simon Bolívar is primarily known for liberating Venezuela, and he is called the Liberator of the North. José de San Martín, known as the Liberator of the South, is primarily known for freeing Argentina. Both men are well-known and lived during about the same time period and even met each other. However, their areas of liberation, methods of liberation and motives were very different from each other.

Bolívar and Martín differed in areas of jurisdiction – Venezuela and Argentina, respectively, as well as methods and means of revolution. Bolívar was 26 years old when Venezuela declared its independence in 1811, and under the revolutionary leader he brought back Francisco de Miranda, who had long advocated freedom from the Spanish rule Venezuela was once under, to become Venezuela’s leader. However, after an erratic and unsuccessful leadership, Bolívar captured Miranda (after his rebel army was stopped) and betrayed him by turning over to the Spanish, but the Spanish only sent Bolívar into exile (unlike Miranda, who they imprisoned). After returning from exile, Bolívar taught creoles that they could rebel successfully against 3 decades of Spanish rule, but was then drove out by the Spaniards. After being chased out of Venezuela three more times, while using terror tactics the Spanish had once used against Creoles such as suffocation, while gaining the support of the British and a bond with Haiti, and while declaring that he would abolish slavery as his first official act (if in power), he decided to build a guerilla warfare army in 1817. After defeating the Spanish in New Granada (which consisted of present-day Columbia, Ecuador, Venezuela, and Panama) using guerilla tactics and the help of thousands of mercenaries from Britain and Germany, he met with San Martín and desired to take advantage of Spain’s falling empire (due to political disagreements and an army revolt), but did not collaborate with him on a major scale. Bolívar formed a series of nations called “Grand Columbia” out of New Granada from which he intended to make a “model of strength and aggression from outside and of cooperation inside”, however, this unification soon disbanded itself (Adams, 33). Bolívar’s last battle ended in splendor in 1823, as it was entirely between cavalry with swords and lances.

5 0
3 years ago
The terms of the document misnamed the Peace Treaty . . . violate the conditions of the Armistice. . . . They do not bring an en
pshichka [43]

Answer:

It claims that Germany has been mistreated.

Explanation:

Driven by French and British desires to make Germany pay for the job it had played in the most difficult strife the world had at this point seen, Wilson and the other Allied delegates at the harmony gathering had for sure moved away from an unadulterated harmony without success.

The Versailles Treaty was marked on 1919. In the interim, restriction to the bargain and its Article 231, seen as an image of the treachery and cruelty of the entire archive, rotted inside Germany.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please help asap! Help me pleaseeeee
    10·1 answer
  • The first investigators determined the USS Maine sank because of A)a bomb onboard the ship. B)spies on the ship. C)a mechanical
    5·2 answers
  • What did andrew jackson's soldiers nicknamed him?
    6·1 answer
  • A two-choice sorting device used in taxonomy to identify tax is known as a _____.
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Roman Empire react to citizens not wanting to join its army due to a decline in patriotism?
    8·2 answers
  • How would life work on the manor?
    12·1 answer
  • After World War I, why did some members of Congress oppose the Treaty of Versailles?
    11·1 answer
  • This year 17,884people atteded basketball teams first game
    13·1 answer
  • What prior knowledge is needed when following a recipe? a. a basic knowledge of cooking terms c. an understanding of the importa
    6·1 answer
  • Why do you think it was called the Forbidden City?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!