<span>It made people more aware of their heritage and promoted the idea of a free sovereign state not controlled by a foreign land. Eg.the people of Ireland were not largely in support of a free Ireland until after England started to commit what could be considered now war crimes after the 1916 rising. Their wars worked against them rather then with them leading to the end of their empire and not the growth of it.
hope this helps</span>
That's a lot of questions! You need not give me the "brainliest," as I may only respond to a couple of those points for the sake of time here.
#2 in your list: In Lincoln's first inaugural address, he said: "Plainly, the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy." In other words, if states could choose to secede from the union, then there was really no union and no government. (Anarchy is the absence of government.) Only if we abide by the constitutional checks we place on ourselves in a democratic republic are we exercising genuine government. Otherwise, we fall into chaos or some sort of dictatorial state. Lincoln felt that the whole concept of self-government was at stake, threatened by the South's desire to secede. Lincoln had to treat the secession of several states as an act of rebellion.
#5 in your list (closely related to #2): The states that had seceded already had caused the civil war, in Lincoln's estimation. The northern states had to respond to hold the union together. The southern states claimed to be afraid for their property, peace and safety with an administration like Lincoln's in charge. But Lincoln saw those fears as unfounded, that all states would continue to enjoy their constitutional privileges. But seceding from the union cut them off from all stability and security.
Answer:
Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states, Any headline that ends in question mark can be answered by the word no which was named after Ian Betteridge. A British technology journalist who wrote about it in 2009.
Answer:
b. governments should actively get involved in addressing unemployment
Explanation:
In Franklin Roosevelt's speech, the US president makes reference to the problem of unemployment, and claims that government should deal with it with wisdom and audacity. Thus he explains that the government should take responsibility for it, as if it were an emergency situation like a war. For instance, he suggests creating employment that has to do with the use of natural resources.