The legitimacy of a government is shaped by the ruler and his rules, or the degree to which the people accept the authority of the government.
<h3>What makes a government legitimate?</h3>
A government is typically stated as being in control of a country and deserving formal recognition, that's symbolized through the change of diplomats between that authority and the governments of different countries.
Hence, The legitimacy of a government is shaped by the ruler and his rules, or the degree to which the people accept the authority of the government.
Learn more about government legitimacy:
brainly.com/question/1748528
#SPJ1
Answer:
c. The way we search the internet affects only our behavior, not the way we think.
Explanation:
Nicholas Carr's essay "Does Go*gle make us St**pd" and his book "The Shallows" all address and talk about the effect of the internet on our cognition and thinking habits. According to Carr, our attention span, concentration, thinking habits and general cognition are affected by the habit of the internet. We are no longer able to read books or research deeply as we depend on seeking out information on the internet, reducing our brain capacity.
<span>René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle (1643-1687) was a French explorer. He was sent by King Louis XIV (14) to travel south from Canada and sail down the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico. He was the first European to travel the length of the Mississippi River (1682).</span>
Answer and Explanation:
The phrase means that money damages the way people act, causing them to act incorrectly and without objectivity, without rationality and full of impulsiveness. As we know, impulsiveness causes people to make completely wrong and often disastrous decisions, which makes us interpret that money leads people to do bad things. This is the meaning of the sentence "money subverts objectivity."
Answer:
bureaucracy
Explanation:
Max Weber argued in favour of bureaucracies as the most efficient and rational means by which human activity could be organized and that this very rationalized process and organized hierarchy would be necessary for keeping things in order. Bureaucracies would then maximize efficiency, and eliminate favouritism among individuals.
He then advocates for bureucracies to have strict rules since he believes they would improve the efficiency of the organizations and in turn cope with administrative needs of the society.
However, Max Weber also notes, that bureaucrats should stay out of the political realm and limit only to the impartial administration of his business since he should rather follow his sense of duty than his personal opinions.