Answer:
B. Spearman
Explanation:
Charles Spearman was a psychologist who proposed a theory of intelligence. According to him, there's a general factor (the g factor) that can be defined as the overall mental capacity of a person and that it's shown when this person performs cognitive tasks.
According to him, there are no different types of intelligence but just a general factor that determines the "intelligence" of a person and, by determining the value of this factor we could determine one person mental capacities.
Unlike the other authors given in the option, he is the <u>only one</u> who thinks there's a <u>single factor behind intelligence measures </u>(Thurstone believed there were different mental abilities, Gardner proposed the theory of multiple intelligences and Sternberg thought that there were 3 types of intelligence)
Therefore, we can conclude that Spearman would have been the most enthusiastic about the value of a single intelligence test score as an index of an individual's mental capacities.
The three major routes were around South America, through Panama canal, and overland.
I hope this helped!!!:)
Garrison co-founded “The Liberator” to espouse his abolitionist views, and in 1832 he organised the New-England Anti-Slavery Society. This society expanded into the American antislavery society which exposed the position that slavery should be immediately abolished. Garrison also emerged as a leading advocate of women’s rights which profits a split in the abolitionist community. In the 1870’s, Garrison became a prominent voice for the women’s suffrage movement.
Hope this helps! C;
I believe the answer is D: Early followers had different opinions about who would lead them.
After the death of Prophet Muhammad, nobody knew who would lead them again, and the religion split apart into two due to this.
According to npr, most of the Prophet Muhammad's followers wanted the community of Muslims to determine who would succeed him; a smaller group thought that someone from his family should take up his mantle.
<em>If this is incorrect, please, don't refrain to tell me. Thank you. </em>
