I think that the best answer is: <span>b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
let's look at the options: </span><span>
a. paleo Indians went to war with each other on a large scale due to scarce water resources
- This could be true if it was really hot, but this was not the case. Warming did not mean a really hot climate, but less harsh: so actually, there would be more, not less water resources.
b.paleo Indians relied less on hunting big animals and more on fishing and gathering food
- this is possible ! a warmer climate would mean that there would be more possibility to fish or gather food, which would mean that people didn't have to hunt - and they would not want to hunt big animals, as it's dangerous.
c.paleo Indians faced food shortages that resulted in a lower population
-no, a warmer climate would mean more, not less, food
d.paleo Indians lost land to rising sea level's</span>
-no, they still had a lot of land.
Answer:
The two main threats to the spotted owl's continued survival are habitat loss and competition from the barred owl an invasive species native to eastern North America.
Explanation:
i hope i helped =)
That statement is false.
It is true that United States adopt a free market system which allow organisations to fully compete and determine the outcome of supply and demand.
That is being said, Business law and Government regulations are still considered to be an important aspects in businesses because it creates a standard rule for fair competition.
