Ladies in Buddhism is a point that can be drawn nearer from differed viewpoints including those of philosophy, history, human sciences and women's liberation. Topical interests incorporate the philosophical status of ladies, the treatment of ladies in Buddhist social orders at home and in broad daylight, the historical backdrop of ladies in Buddhism, and a correlation of the encounters of ladies crosswise over various types of Buddhism. As in different religions, the encounters of Buddhist ladies have changed impressively.In Theravada Buddhism, it is outlandish for a lady to be a bodhisattva, which is somebody on their approach to Buddhahood. Bodhisattva can be a human, creature, serpent, or a divine being, however is never a lady.
The Theravada does not deny ladies to end up noticeably stirred, but rather they can't lead a Buddhist people group. In the event that the desire to Buddhahood has been made and a Buddha of the time affirms it, it is difficult to be reawakened as a lady. A proper point is for ladies to try to be renewed as male. They can turn into a male by moral activities and earnest yearning to maleness. Being conceived a female is a consequence of awful karma.
Answer:
umm if u copy and paste the question u can find what u need from google
Explanation:
Ship owner Charles Booth wanted to disprove socialist claims that one-fourth of Londoners were impoverished. Although he first assumed this was overstated, his 17-volume study eventually showed that the real number was far higher: one-third.
This is further explained below.
<h3>What are politicians?</h3>
Generally, A person who is involved in party politics or who either has or seeks to occupy an elected post in the government is referred to as a politician. Laws that govern the country and, by extension, its inhabitants are proposed, supported, and rejected by politicians, who themselves establish these laws. To use a general definition, a politician is somebody who aspires to hold influential political positions inside a government.
In conclusion, Shipowner Charles Booth set out to disprove the socialists' claims that one-fourth of London's residents were living in poverty. He believed that this was overstated, but the results of his investigation, which were published in 17 volumes, showed that the actual amount was considerably higher, at one-third.
Read more about residents
brainly.com/question/2375274
#SPJ1
I believe the answer is: A-he disagreed with slavery but supported compromise
Daniel Webster was known as the leading supporter for Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 that required federal officials to capture and punish slaves that were running away. Because of this Webster was viciously attacked by the abolitionist because he agreed to the compromise rather than fully eliminated slavery.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "violent rioting" since this is not given to them as a power by the laws of the United States.</span></span>
