<u>Science</u> is a systematic way of learning about the world through observations and experiments that lead to a pool of knowledge.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation: </u>
The structured learning way about the universe via theories and practical scenarios to gain knowledge is called science. Physics, Engineering are some of the best examples of it. It simply presents based on proper research.
Pseudoscience is mostly the unproven strategies or theories that consider to be a scientific one. The theory refers to the group of concepts that explains something in a detailed manner. Psychology is defined as a study of one’s behavior and mentality scientifically.
Some Canadians live on farms in the Central Prairies
Answer:
Using alternative crops would help keep the soil healthy.
Explanation:
George Washington Carver who lived between 1860s to 1943 was an American agricultural scientist, and popularly known for his advocacy for alternative crops to cotton and methods to prevent soil depletion. He was considered as one of the foremost black scientist of the early 20th century
In his attempts to improve depleted soils for agricultural purpose, Carver developed techniques that involved farmers to grow other crops, such as peanuts and sweet potatoes, as a source of their own food and to improve their quality of life.
Hence, George Washington Carver think using alternative crops to cotton would help keep the soil healthy.
Answer:
Provide retrospective but not predictive explanations of development.
Explanation:
There are some critiques to the Evolutionary Theories, among them: Biological Deterministic way of seeing the Hominideos and in many ways reductionist, to make it complex things simpler.
Analyzing the options then:
Provide retrospective but not predictive explanations of development.
These theories were not able to fulfill a model of predicting the future, leaving it blank for speculations. Also, it does not provide a cohesive and coherent basis model to predict the Post Homo Sapiens' future.
Despite those and other criticisms, this hasn't been enough to discard the Evolutionary Theories. On the other hand, the criticisms should be open for the sake of science.
Answer:
It's a good principle, but not something that can be enforced through government policy. Especially since anyone can call you intolerant if you simply disagree with them.
Explanation: