A brief treatment trial tested an adaption of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) for weekly assessment of worry. 28 nonclinical high-worriers received instruction in cognitive restructuring strategies, with 14 of them acting as a control group in a lagged waiting-list design.
<h3>What do you mean by stoeber, j., & bittencourt, j. (1998)?</h3>
The Penn State Worry Questionnaire-Past Week (PSWQ-PW) was highly reliable and substantially valid in assessing both (a) the weekly status of worry and (b) treatment-related changes in worry, according to the results. The average Cronbach's alpha was 0.91, and the average convergent correlation with a past-week adaptation of the Worry Domains Questionnaire [Tallis, F., Eysenck, M. W. and Mathews (1992). a survey for measuring nonpathological anxiety [Zielke, M. and Kopf-Mehnert, C., Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 161–168.] was 0.63, and pre-post progress on the PSWQ–PW had a 0.71 connection with the Questionnaire of Changes in Experiencing and Behavior (1978). Questions about changing one's experiences and behaviors. Germany's Weinheim: Beltz Test Gesellschaft.
To learn more about Questionnaire, Visit:
brainly.com/question/25685309
#SPJ4
From a research perspective, one could say that there was a high level of "<u>interrater</u>" reliability between the three reports.
The term reliability in psychological research alludes to the consistency of an exploration study or estimating test.
Inter-rater reliability refers to the test-retest strategy surveys the outside consistency of a test. This alludes to how much unique raters give predictable assessments of a similar conduct. Between rater reliability can be utilized for interviews.
So far there have only been two us presidents who were impeached and removed from office,Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson, but later on the senate acquitted them.
