There are many words that can be used to describe Samuel Pepys. The inferences that I can make about the background and personality of Samuel Pepys based on his diary entry about the Great Fire of London was that;
- His words on the diary shows he was a truthful person as there were other documentations by him that the other contemporary documents do not have.
- He was a man who after realizing his faults, stood for a cause of fighting against corruption.
- He helped maintain order. This also shows how peaceful and orderly he is and he works for the common good of the people.
- He is a person who pays attention too details as he gave an accurate description of the Fire and how it occurred.
Samuel Pepys is known to be born on 23 February 1633 and he died on 26 May 1703. He was a famous English diarist and also known to be a naval administrator.
He was known to be an eyewitness of some major historical events such as the Great Plague of 1665 and the Great Fire of London in 1666. He is known to be one Britain's most highly respected, celebrated personality.
Learn more about Samuel Pepys from
brainly.com/question/2626833
Answer- A vanitas is a symbolic work of art showing the transience of life, the futility of pleasure, and the certainty of death, often contrasting symbols of wealth and symbols of ephemerality and death.
Hope this helps:)
Answer:
3. is A
4. is D
Explanation:
If i am wrong i am sorry Y-Y
Answer:
1.Considering it was written in a situation so infused with racial issues, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is often strangely divorced from explicitly racial issues. Obviously, Dr. King cannot avoid the topic, but much of his argument, especially in the letter’s first half, is presented in universalist terms and through abstractions like “justice” and the interrelatedness of man. He argues that the clergymen, and his larger audience, should support his cause not because the victims are black but because it is the right thing to do. However, this passionate but restrained argument ultimately sets the stage for a declaration of what scholar Jonathan Rieder calls “a proclamation of black self-sufficiency” (94). Once he establishes the definitions of justice and morality, Dr. King argues that the black man will succeed with or without the help of white moderates because they operate with the just ideals of both secular America and divine guidance. Further, he implicitly suggests that by continuing to facilitate the oppression of the black man through moderation, his audience is operating in sin and will ultimately be on the losing side.
2.One recurring idea that supports Dr. King’s arguments is that group mentality supports and enables immorality, and that the individual must therefore act for justice even when the group does not share that goal. He makes this point explicitly in the early part of the “Letter.” This argument supports his defense of civil disobedience, allows him to criticize the church for supporting the status quo rather than empowering crusaders for change, and supports the idea that law must reflect morality since it might otherwise be designed solely for the comfort of the majority. Overall, the discussion of group immorality supports his purpose of encouraging individual action in the face of injustice, and criticizing those who do not support such individual action for fear of upsetting the status quo.
Explanation:
A good method is letting everyone state their thoughts on the matter.
