1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serhud [2]
3 years ago
10

Which describes the revisionist or conflict perspective in historiography?. A. Historical perspectives change over time dependin

g upon the biases of the writer. B. History is impossible to record accurately without primary source documentation. C. History is and should be recorded as it happens, as factual and fixed information. D. History is recorded most accurately according to the experts of the time period in question. E. History should be recorded from either a top down or bottom up perspective.
History
2 answers:
evablogger [386]3 years ago
5 0
History <span>is and should be recorded as it happens, as factual and fixed information is the one among all the choices that describes the revolutionist or conflict perspective in historiography. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope it helps you.</span>
Veronika [31]3 years ago
5 0

A. Historical perspectives change over time depending on the biases of the writer.

Historians themselves are embedded in time periods and cultures, and the times and cultures in which they live influence their understanding and interpretation of the history they record. Historiography, that is, the writing of history, is a field of study in itself, seeing the work of historians within the different contexts from which they were doing their research and writing. Revisionist approaches happen as historical context changes and attitudes change.

As an example, you might look at histories of the establishment of modern Israel written by Israeli historians in the decades shortly after 1948 as compared to recent decades. The earlier historians painted the picture in strong, patriotic terms, without giving too much attention to the side of their opponents -- Palestinians and neighboring Arab countries. More recent "revisionist" historians have sought to look at the whole picture more fully, including the perspective of the peoples Israel antagonized or displaced as the new nation established itself in the land.

You might be interested in
What was the outcome Glorious Revolution?
Nana76 [90]

Answer:

Correct answer is William and Mary became joint monarchs and James II was overthrown without  bloodshed.

Explanation:

First option is the correct one as William and Mary were called by British Parliament to take the throne of England, but with the obligation to respect Bill of Rights. James II as the last ruler of Stuart dynasty left the country.

Second option is not correct because as we have said they were called to come to England, they didn't invade it.

Third option is not correct as two of them ruled England for a certain period of time.

Fourth option is not correct as England (Great Britain) is still a monarchy.

4 0
3 years ago
What goes in the blank?10pts
MrRissso [65]
Probably a name would fill the blank such as sally or emily or maybe something vague such as girl
4 0
3 years ago
Do you think the Embargo Act was a smart idea? Why or why not?
galina1969 [7]

here you go

The diplomatic neutrality of the United States was tested during the Napoleonic Wars (1803-1815). The warring nations of Britain and France both imposed trade restrictions in order to weaken each other's economies. These restrictions also disrupted American trade and threatened American neutrality. As time went on, British harassment of American ships increased. Controversial measures included British impressment of American men and seizure of American goods. After the Chesapeake Affair in June 1807, pitting the British warship Leopard against the American frigate Chesapeake, President Thomas Jefferson faced a decision regarding the situation at hand. Ultimately, he chose an economic option to assert American rights: The Embargo Act of 1807.

Impressment

Although not restricted to the presidential administrations of Jefferson and James Madison, the on-going impressment of American sailors became a key issue for the United States during the Napoleonic Wars. After witnessing the horrors of war with France, many British sailors deserted His Majesty's navy and enlisted in the American merchant marines. In order to retrieve the deserters, British "press gangs" came aboard American ships. The British, however, tended to take anyone who could pass as a British soldier – unless the sailor could prove his American citizenship. Approximately 1,000, out of the estimated 10,000 men taken from American ships, were proven to have British citizenship.1

James Madison had summed up the contrasting points of view in an 1804 letter to James Monroe:

6 0
2 years ago
Choose all that apply.
sattari [20]
The two types of sources are maps and artifacts
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What effect did world war 2 have on the United States
klio [65]
The war caused the united states to enter another severe depression
the united states became the most richest powerful nation in the world
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The first important law regulating monopolies in the united states was
    15·1 answer
  • In dessert regions, what can lead to conflict
    10·1 answer
  • why did hamilton believe that paying off the states wartime debts was important for the future of the nation
    5·1 answer
  • Create a timeline for Nelson Mandela
    12·1 answer
  • The immigrant group that was primarily Presbyterian was: a. Swedish. b. English. c. Irish. d. Scotch-Irish. e. German.
    5·1 answer
  • What main point does Mussolini make about fascism in this passage?
    9·1 answer
  • The Taiping Rebellion
    15·1 answer
  • What negotiations would you suggest for countries who are hostile towared each other
    8·1 answer
  • President Franklin Roosevelt's judicial reform bill would have allowed him to reject a Supreme Court decision by protesting to C
    14·2 answers
  • Not picking one's nose in public, not wearing a bathing suit to a formal wedding and not staring at someone who is in an elevato
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!