1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna11 [10]
3 years ago
11

What strategies did both césar chávez and the ufwoc use to achieve their goals? how did they successfully apply these tactics?

History
1 answer:
docker41 [41]3 years ago
6 0
Cesar Chavez and the United Farmer Workers used different forms of nonviolent protest in order to achieve their goals. For example, in 1965 workers who worked on grapes farm went on strike due to their poor pay and working conditions. This was known as the Delano grape strike. Along with strike, individuals also boycotted (aka refused to buy) the products. The goal in doing this would be to hurt the amount of profit individuals made of grapes. These tactics were used for 5 years, and resulted in a positive effect for the UFWOC, as they were able to gain their first written contract with the growers.
You might be interested in
What is the first delegate selection event in every presidential election since 1972?
Monica [59]

The Iowa caucuses are always first.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the reasons for the division of isreal and judah?
Likurg_2 [28]
The reasons are that Rehoboam attempted to continue his father, Solomon's unwise policy of swinging taxes and then arrogantly increased them when the Israelites complained. In a very short time, the Israelites rebelled and split from Israel, forming their own kingdom called Israel.
5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP 
Nastasia [14]
Generally speaking a mixed economy is "<span>B-a combination of individual choice and government protection," although the balance is often more tilted towards individual choice. </span>
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do the actions taken against the armenians seem like acceptable wartime actions?
Rashid [163]

Many countries around the world took different decisions during wartime. Some have been more brutal and difficult than we could have imagined. But in this situation that the Armenians faced, political events also had an effect. If you really want to get the right answer, you have to turn your perspective to both sides. Because both sides see themselves as justified in this event in history. And indeed, both sides have their faults and their justifications. In 1919, two American diplomats who wanted to investigate the event impartially visited the region. Their names were Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, and their view of the region was that both sides were right. Among the statements they wrote, it was written that the Armenians formed gangs against the Turks and plundered the Turkish villages in the region. But they also wrote that "Turkish soldiers were displaying a bad attitude towards Armenian civilians. According to the Turks, the reason for this was that the Armenians caused unrest in the region and took part in gang actions against the Turks. So the soldiers had to take control of the area. But when we look further into the past, we see that Armenians and Turks lived in peace in the empire. Even Armenian representatives took part in the Ottoman parliament in the 19th century. The reason why 2 communities that lived in harmony are so angry with each other is that foreign countries provoke the region to annex the region. We know that in the first world war, Russia wanted to invade the region. We also know that the Russians want to include the Orthodox Armenians in the region among themselves. It would not be difficult to conclude that the Russians formed gangs from the Armenians in the region and provoked them against the Kurdish and Turkish villages in the region. If this is indeed true, we would conclude that both parties are right in their own way.

7 0
2 years ago
How successful were labor unions in achieving their goals in the 1800s?
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

<em>Labour unions were not very successful in achieving their goals in the 1800s.</em>

Workers organized unions to solve their problems.Their problems were <em>low wages</em> and <em>unsafe working conditions</em>.

The tactics used by labour unions were <em>strike </em>and <em>collective bargaining</em>. The disagreement between the needs of the employers and the demands of the employees gave rise to the evolution of the unions.The workers could not only bargain for their <em>salary</em> but also <em>working conditions</em>,<em>job security</em> and <em>benefits</em> through the <em>union</em>. Initially,workers formed local unions in single factories.These unions used strikes to try to force employers to i<em>ncrease wages </em>or make <em>working conditions safer</em>.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • (02.06 LC)
    8·2 answers
  • In the space provided, analyze the relationship between democracy and the free enterprise system. Give an example of how the two
    6·2 answers
  • Where did the worlds first democracy develop?​
    5·2 answers
  • Who were most often the teachers in freedmen's bureau schools?​
    6·1 answer
  • What is true about Henry Hudson
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE SOMEONE HELP ME IDK HOW TO PUT THIS THANK YOU!!!
    8·1 answer
  • What did original performances of Shakespeare's plays have in common with modern Broadway plays?
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Southern Democrats Trust Franklin Pierce to represent their party in the election of 1852? He disagreed with the passage
    6·1 answer
  • Where is my da<br> help me find my dad he went to go get some milk
    10·1 answer
  • Should coaches and players be allowed to pray on the field after a game, or does this violate “separation of church and state”?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!