The author shows a favorable bias towards Mendel's research and an unfavorable bias towards the opinions of Mendel's scientific peers, by using specific diction such as “deep impact” when referring to Mendel's work and “very little understanding” when expressing the beliefs of scientists, as shown in option C.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Diction is very important for an author to be able to express their thoughts within a text.
- In "The Journey to Acceptance," we can see the efficient use of diction when the author states that Mendel's research had a "profound impact" on the scientific community.
- With this, the author shows a favorable bias to Mendel's research, stating that it is important and its impact was essential.
- On the other hand, the author states that Mendel's peer opinions are not as relevant as they are of “very small understanding.”
- With that, he shows a negative bias, claiming that the opinions of Mendel's peers are not as relevant.
It is important to point out that diction refers to the use of specific words to expose a message through a text.
More information:
brainly.com/question/5308214?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
The author views Diane France as a creative problem solver, and writes to inform readers about the time France made a cast of her own tongue.
Explanation:
The statement that best describes Hopping’s viewpoint and purpose in this excerpt: "the author views Diane France as a creative problem solver, and writes to inform readers about the time France made a cast of her own tongue"
The excerpt actually shows that France is a creative problem solver. She actually reveals this by sharing her story when Diane France made the cast of her tongue. She actually made used of her own tools and used them in a creative way to achieve the result she had. Also, the excerpt tells readers about the time France made a cast of her tongue.
Just because references are an option im gonna say those,
