Answer:
The author supports their claim that "The Inca were great builders" by talking about how much they loved stone and took pride in their work of building temples and fortifications. What they built was sacred to them and they put extraordinary effort into it. According to the text in paragraph 12, it says, "Constructed without mortar, the joins between them are so tight as to deny a knife-blade entry. A vast labor force was required. There are records of 20 men working on a single stone, chipping away, hoisting and lowering it, polishing it with sand, hour-by-hour, for an entire year." The Inca took building very seriously, and the author shows this by providing more detail into the intricates of the design and the amount of time and effort it takes for them to make these creations.
Explanation:
Answer:
is the answer that the story was important?
Explanation:
Johnny resembled hard work, no matter what condition. Making this folktale story memorable.
Answer:
Boundless and bare.
Explanation:
It's ironic because there is only a remnant of this man after he claimed to be the king of kings.
Funny enough I had to memorize this poem in middle school
Answer:
Explanation:
The main difference is that historical fiction is that it has a fictional (fake) element but has the main historical theme present. True historical has all of the correct details, characters, plot etc, no fiction involved
Answer:
What are the following blends..?
