Alright so if this is a test then it would be...
Option D. The one that Mitchell Palmer tend to go after with his infamous raids were the foreign-born people he considered radicals, especially anarchists and communists. Hope this answers your question. Have a great day ahead!
the colinists got mad and boom
The appropriate response is Basil II. The rule of Basil II, generally recognized to be one of the remarkable Byzantine sovereigns, outstandingly represents both the quality and the shortcoming of the Byzantine arrangement of government. His unstoppable and powerful identity and his savvy statesmanship were balanced by the inborn shortcoming of a supreme absolutism that depended such a great amount on the character of the ruler.
Answer:
you spelled them both times
Answer:
Explanation:
Given textual and archaeological evidence, it is thought that thousands of Europeans lived in Imperial China during the period of Mongol rule.[1] These were people from countries traditionally belonging to the lands of Christendom during the High to Late Middle Ages who visited, traded, performed Christian missionary work, or lived in China. This occurred primarily during the second half of the 13th century and the first half of the 14th century, coinciding with the rule of the Mongol Empire, which ruled over a large part of Eurasia and connected Europe with their Chinese dominion of the Yuan dynasty (1271–1368).[2] Whereas the Byzantine Empire centered in Greece and Anatolia maintained rare incidences of correspondence with the Tang, Song and Ming dynasties of China, the Roman papacy sent several missionaries and embassies to the early Mongol Empire as well as to Khanbaliq (modern Beijing), the capital of the Mongol-led Yuan Dynasty. These contacts with the West were preceded by rare interactions between the Han-period Chinese and Hellenistic Greeks and Romans.
