1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zimovet [89]
3 years ago
7

The treaty ending the Spanish-American war made the Philippines a U.S. territory. What was another provision of the treaty?

History
2 answers:
Tju [1.3M]3 years ago
4 0
"B. Cuban independence was assured" was another provision of the treaty, since one of the main reasons the United States got involved in this conflict in the first place was to protect the rights of the Cuban people. 
sleet_krkn [62]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is B) Cuban independence was assured.

The Spanish-American War was one in which the United States got involved in helping Cuba become free from Spanish control. The United States ended up winning this war, helping Cuba become free from Spanish control. Along with this, the US gained the Philippines, Guam, and Puerto Rico from this deal. This helped to start the beginning of the American Empire.

You might be interested in
Having only one third of its members stand for election at a time means that the Senate is?
GuDViN [60]

Answer: the senate vote for president

Explanation:

i'm just spit balling rn i'm sure i'm right

4 0
3 years ago
What do most religions have that buddhism does not
saul85 [17]

Answer:

Buddhism does not have a God. But many Buddhists keep images of Buddha. Buddha is not seen as the first prophet of the religion, but as the fourth prophet of the religion. There are two main doctrines in Buddhism, Mahayana and Hinayana.

Explanation:

Please mark as brainliest

5 0
3 years ago
Which of these constitutional rights was the basis for Schenck’s and Deb’s arguments?
Nesterboy [21]

The First Amendement (Freedom of Speech) was the basis for Charles Schenck's 1919 Supreme Court arguments that his distribution of flyers and leaflets during WWI to promote draft resistance among young men was Constitutional.

Schenck was arrested under the Espionage Act of 1917. The Supreme Court upheld the decision finding that draft resistance in the midst of WWI was unconstitutional.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does NIMBY stand for? What attitude does it represent?
larisa86 [58]
NINBY stands for “Not in my back yard” and it represents a negative attitude of the people who opposed zoning and building developments for selfish reasons.
8 0
3 years ago
List the factors which brought The first world War?​
yanalaym [24]

1. Friends don’t let friends fight alone

A tangled web of strong political alliances among nations meant that most great powers felt obliged to help their partners once war was declared.

After the murder of an Austrian Archduke by Serbian assassins, Austria-Hungary prepared for war against Serbia, which was allied with Russia.

Once Russia mobilized, Austria-Hungary’s ally, Germany, declared war on both Russia and Russia’s ally, France. Great Britain and its empire, sympathetic to France, declared war on Germany (Canada was not consulted).

Alliances originally intended as defensive pacts ended up looking threatening to outsiders. This perilous network of allegiances is an accepted part of all narratives about the First World War. German historian Andreas Hilgruber was one of many who showed how dangerous and costly all of these alliances were.

2. Armed to the teeth

Europe in 1914 was armed to the teeth. Vast fleets of warships were being constructed, conscription was implemented in most of the great powers to allow large armies to be kept in reserve, weapons and ammunition were stockpiled, and detailed war plans were made.

The impact of the proliferation of the instruments of war as a cause of the outbreak of the conflict was highlighted by David Stevenson’s Armaments and the Coming of War (1996). A large army spoiling for a fight may well seek one out.

3. Capitalist imperialism

During the First World War, Vladimir Lenin, the father of the Soviet Union, wrote an essay entitled Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism (1917), in which he laid out the foundation of his own philosophy of communism.

He believed that the war was the product of capitalist financial monopolies within states, which created national rivalries and led the great powers into a destructive conflict over access to raw materials and undeveloped markets.

Others since have blamed imperialism itself and commercial interests.

4. War on a tight schedule

A.J.P. Taylor, one of the 20th century’s great historians, argued in War by Timetable (1969) that in 1914, thanks to relatively new transportation (railroad) and communications (telegraph and telephone) technologies, every European power believed that the ability to mobilize their armies faster than their neighbours would by itself deter war.

Every power drafted elaborate mobilization timetables so that they could outrace their potential opponents. When the crisis of 1914 occurred, none of the leaders really wanted war, according to Taylor, but each felt they had to mobilize faster than the others or lose the advantage.

They became the victims of their own logistical preparations, and Europe slid unwillingly but relentlessly into war. Barbara Tuchman’s book The Guns of August (1962) similarly identified the dangers of technology in causing conflicts to escalate rapidly.

5. Blame Germany

In the Treaty of Versailles that officially ended the war, Germany was made to accept the blame for causing the conflict, and after that German governments spent decades denying their sole responsibility.

They convinced many people, but after the Second World War, German historian Fritz Fischer looked into previously-classified archives for the first time. Fischer concluded in his book German War Aims in the First World War (1961) that Imperial Germany had deliberately provoked a general war as part of a policy of conquest much like that undertaken by Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany 20 years later.

Fischer’s conclusions remain controversial to this day.

6. No, blame Britain

The idea that Britain caused the war was the live grenade that firebrand historian Niall Ferguson lobbed into the debate when he wrote The Pity of War (1999), though Paul Schroeder had put forward a similar argument earlier.

Ferguson claimed that not only did British statesmen encourage France and Russia to oppose Germany, but that Britain’s own intervention turned a regional European brawl into a global war.

The British may not have directly started it, according to Ferguson, but they were liable for greatly expanding the scope of the war and making it drag on as long as it did.

7. People being people

Canadian historian Margaret Macmillan has published a major book, The War That Ended Peace (2013), which presents a synthesis of many different factors: alliances and power politics; reckless diplomacy; ethnic nationalism; and, most of all, the personal character and relationships of the almost uncountable number of historical figures who had a hand in the coming of war.

Her work helps to highlight the fact that for all the great and powerful forces that seemed to grind the world inexorably into war in 1914, everything ultimately came down to the beliefs, prejudices, rivalries, and schemes of a great array of personalities and people.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the goal of the pan African conferences
    5·1 answer
  • The purpose of amendments to the united states constitution has generally been to
    7·1 answer
  • What does the debate between Madison and Jefferson tell us about the importance of compromise?
    8·2 answers
  • Which was a fundamental principle expressed by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg following World War II
    12·1 answer
  • Developing Scientific Knowledge
    14·2 answers
  • How would the introduction of labor saving devices impact life in rural America.
    8·1 answer
  • How did Spanish explorers find a route across the Pacific Ocean?
    5·2 answers
  • Based on this sentence, you can classify Russia's political system as being a
    13·2 answers
  • Please help
    13·1 answer
  • Since the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, we have seen governments at all levels try to mount a response on a scale and ti
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!