1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arte-miy333 [17]
4 years ago
6

In 100 to 150 words, analyze Japanese nationalism and Japanese nationalists' view of Americans that justified their attack on Pe

arl Harbor. Be certain to back up your opinions with evidence you've gathered in this course.
History
1 answer:
My name is Ann [436]4 years ago
4 0
The Japanese saw it as a great triumph. They traveled to the harbor knowing they can't come back, but knew their people would see them as heros. They saw the US as lazy and terrible people. An easy target. Their attack did devastate many, and hardly any there stood up to the Japanese. Almost proving their views on us.

But by seeing how they did that and thought we were "lazy" we just sent a nuke there and made them see us differently ;)
You might be interested in
What role do state legislatures and the U.S congress play in the policy making process?
ololo11 [35]

The answer is D. for apex

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which strategy did Ida B. Wells use to initiate an anti-lynching law?
EleoNora [17]
<span>Ida B Wells used a strategy we would today called "data journalism" in her anti-lynching campaign. She traveled through the south keeping records of all the lynchings that occured and the reasons for them. She then put this together in her book "A Red Record: Tabulated Statistics and Alleged Causes of Lynchings In the United States" establishing several arguments of how lynchings were used to control African Americans.</span>
8 0
4 years ago
What are the common characteristics of Absolute Monarchs on the crown
s344n2d4d5 [400]

The main characteristic of the absolute monarchies was the existence of a king who had absolute political control. This meant that there were no laws, division of powers, or any other form of control over the decisions or actions of the monarch.

4 0
3 years ago
ANYONE PLEASE HELP ME I REALLY NEED THE ANSWER RIGHT NOW BECAUSE I HAVE TO PASS THIS LATER NIGHT I HOPE Y’ALL CAN HELP ME:(
Burka [1]

1. Because it was warming in the south and that's where the animals were heading.

2. B

3. A

4. D

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
.help plz ...........​
ryzh [129]

Answer:

B. Simon Bolivar

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did Africans have to succumb to European imperialism?
    6·1 answer
  • After they finished revisions to their constitution, the Choctaw established a legislative branch comprised of __________. A. a
    14·2 answers
  • (actual answers please)
    8·1 answer
  • An example of interstate cooperation required by the Constitution would be __________.
    9·2 answers
  • What is the most accurate conclusion someone can draw from this grapLook at the bar graph. What is the most accurate conclusion
    11·2 answers
  • Explain why Egypt was a source of Anglo-French rivalry.
    9·1 answer
  • The number seats granted to each state and the size of each district within each both based on which criteria?
    5·1 answer
  • HELP MMEH PLEASE I REALLY NEED YOUR HELP
    9·1 answer
  • Why did house speaker newt gingrich feel embolded enough to offer a document like his contract whith america in 1994
    5·1 answer
  • In Spanish Colonial society, what were purebloods from Spain known as?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!