1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Viktor [21]
3 years ago
15

How do the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness limit the powers of

History
1 answer:
Brilliant_brown [7]3 years ago
4 0

i believe it is B) unalienable rights force the government to place no restrictions on liberty.

You might be interested in
To protect its interests in the Middle East, in 1939, Great Britain declared that it would
Step2247 [10]

Answer:

Correct answer is C.) restrict the number of Jews immigrating to Palestine.

Explanation:

Options A and B are not correct because no one was to be forced to leave the place of their residence according to the documents that British government proposed.

Option C is correct as according to White Paper that was presented by the government it was said that number of Jews who will immigrate will be restricted after 75 000 Jews immigrate to Palestine.

Option D is also not correct as this was done by United Nations in 1947.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which group of native americans sheltered escaped slaves and fought to keep the u.s. army out of spanish territory?
Leto [7]
<span>i believe the answer is Black seminoles

 
</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The completion of the Erie Canal played a key role in which development? A) New York City becoming a vital commercial center wit
dedylja [7]

The answer is A) New York City becoming a vital commercial center with the country’s busiest seaport

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain why America is a representative democracy and not a direct democracy.
padilas [110]

Answer:

The United States of America is considered to be a representative democracy because American citizens elect officials serve as their representation in government. For example, a U.S. Senator. There are 100 Senators, 2 Senators representing each of the 50 States. Those Senators are elected by the inhabitants of their state for one reason; and that's because they will represent those inhabitants in government. This is why campaigning and appealing is so crucial to winning elected office; you want people to entrust you with the task of representing them.

A simpler way to imagine a representative democracy is like this:

Citizen ⇒ Representative ⇒ Government

The concept of a direct democracy differs from that of a representative democracy because unlike above, in which there is a "middleman" between the citizens and the government, there is no middleman in the case of a direct democracy. That is why it's "direct."

3 0
3 years ago
If Roosevelt’s judicial reform had been passed, how would new judges have been appointed?
Rasek [7]

Correct answer:  B) on the basis of the age of sitting judges.

Context/explanation:

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was eager to implement his New Deal programs as an antidote to the Great Depression.  However, the US Supreme Court had already ruled that some provisions of the New Deal were unconstitutional, because they took too much power into the hands of the federal government, especially the executive branch of the federal government.  So, riding the momentum of his landslide reelection victory in 1936, in February of 1937, FDR proposed a plan to expand the Supreme Court to as many as 15 judges.  The plan offered to provide full pay to justices over age 70 who would retire.  If the older justices didn't retire, assistant justices (with full voting rights) would be appointed to sit with those existing justices.  This was a way FDR hoped to give the court a liberal majority that would side with his programs.

As it turned out, before FDR's proposal came up for a vote in Congress, two of the sitting justices came over to his side of the argument, and the Supreme Court narrowly approved as constitutional both the Social Security Act and the National Labor Relations Act.  So his plan (which failed in the US Senate) became unnecessary to his purposes.  

Roosevelt's "court-packing" scheme was unpopular. It was seen as an attempt to take away the independence of the judicial branch of government.  

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In spite of the approaching battle, Mrs. Henry was reluctant to be taken from her home. Why do you think she wanted to stay in s
    10·1 answer
  • What are some things you should include when doing a project on capitalism?
    9·1 answer
  • Four Noble Truths
    8·1 answer
  • 2. Egyptians had a great influence on the Greek sculptors of the _______<br> period.
    10·2 answers
  • 1. Ghana traded its gold for all of the following except
    7·1 answer
  • In your own words explain mystical experiences (mysticism).
    15·2 answers
  • Can you help me here pls?
    5·1 answer
  • Because of his attention to the rights of the French People, King Louis-Philippe is referred to as ________ . a. "the Sun King"
    7·2 answers
  • How many peopple killed in perryville earthquake 2021
    8·1 answer
  • Why does Mrs. Bird say she will break the new law?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!