By inference, the way in which Zaroff is portrayed as Rainsford’s foil is that: "Zaroff is a person without a conscience, but Rainsford has one." (Option B)
<h3>What is the explanation for the above inference?</h3>
As evidenced by the excerpt, Zaroff is not opposed to murdering others, which he regards as a form of hunting.
He has no regard for human life and is unconcerned whether they live or die, which distinguishes his character from Rainsford's.
Learn more about inference at;
brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
Answer: She told a Boston newspaper reporter that she was deliberately "trying to give [her guests] something different." Using an ice pick, she broke a semi-sweet chocolate bar into small pieces and mixed them into the batter
Explanation: I did the quiz and I got it right lol (and don’t for get to rate it)
The faulty logic that the given sentence contains is B. Either-or Fallacy. An either-or fallacy is the limiting of possible answers into two or it is oversimplifying. In the given sentence above, it only gives two possible answers: either meeting the deadline, or if not the town will suffer.
