Answer:A. Leontief assumed that U.S. and foreign technologies were the same, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model assumes they are different
B. Leontief ignored land abundance in the United States
D. Leontief’s test distinguished between skilled and unskilled labor, but ignored capital.
Explanation:Leontief paradox is a Russian-American economist, his work was based on the work of Wassily W. Leontief he attempted to test the Heckscher–Ohlin theory ("H–O theory") empirically.
in economics tries to explain that a country with a higher capital per worker has a lower Capital per labor ratio in export than when compared to Import.
LEONTIEF IGNORED THE ABUNDANCE OF LAND IN MAKING HIS ASSUMPTIONS
HE ALSO CLASSIFIED THE U.S TECHNOLOGY AND OTHERS AS THE SAME WHICH IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE H-O MODEL ASSUMPTION.
LEONTIEF THEORY IGNORED CAPITAL DURING HIS TEST.
Answer:No
Explanation: the company requested to the team to develop an alternative to improve the client's satisfaction and reduce loss
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, it seems that something is missing here. "Progressivism, where will you put your million dollars answers?" is the section of the examination, but it is not a specif question.
So what is what you want to know?
However, trying to offer some help, we can comment on the following.
Progressivism was the period in the history of the United States during the end of the 1800s and the beginning of the 1900s, in which many social leaders demanded changes to the consequences of the industrial era and exposed the ways fabrics and industries exploited workers and children. It also was a time when "muckraker" journalists exposed the corruption of the federal government. It was a true time of changes in America.
Those progressive leaders and their ideas made the government to create the kind of legislation to change things for the better in the country.
Answer: 26.5% increase
Explanation:
Current profit = Sales - Variable costs - fixed costs
= ((32.50 - 16.50) * 360 bears) - 1,420
= $4,340
Sales increase by 20% = 360 * ( 1 + 20%) = 432 bears
New profit;
= ((32.50 - 16.50) * 432 bears) - 1,420
= $5,492
Effect of sales increase = ( 5,492 - 4,340) / 4,340
= 26.5% increase
