1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Romashka [77]
4 years ago
11

During the French and Indian War, France and Great Britain fought for control of North American territory. What impact did the e

nd of the war have on the American colonies?
History
2 answers:
Evgesh-ka [11]4 years ago
7 0
Hi there,

The biggest effect of the French and Indian War was that it taught the 13 American colonies how to fight together. Before this war there was a mutual distrust between the thirteen. The next common foe would be Great Britain in the American Revolution.

This war also left Great Britain in extreme financial trouble within their military which of course will be a huge advantage for the colonists in the Revolution.

Great Britain tried to tax the colonists to make some money to be able to afford their military but this backfired when the colonists asked for representation in parliament-were denied- and started tossing tea off ships in Boston. 

Therefore, we can really thank the French and Indian War for paving the way to our freedom. 
Serhud [2]4 years ago
6 0

During the French and Indian War, France and Great Britain fought for control of North American territory. The impact that this war had on American colonies was loss of lives and also lost ample amount of money for trade but they also gained access to upper Ohio River.  

Further explanation:

The French Indian war was the conflict between France and Great Britain and also known as ‘Seven Years War’ and this war started in year 1756 and because of Treaty of Paris, this war ended in year 1763. The name ‘Seven Years war’was given to this war because it lasted for seven years. The Great Britain gained a lot from this war as by the time this war ended, Britain had excessive territorial gains in North America but these gains lasted for some time only as there was dispute in regards to frontier policy and paying of war expense which later led to colonial discontent and in the end lead to American Revolution.

The boundaries between France and Great Britain were unidentified and were unmarked, France claimed its territory over Mississippi basin but Britain was not agreeing to it and objected it along with that, The French begin to construct its territories around Ohio river because they wanted to shield native American population from British attacks. But once the treaty of Paris was signed, Britain was the one among both nations which suffered more damage as it lost allot of money in its military expenses and Access of Ohio river was granted to American colonists.  

Learn more:

1. What contributed to the downfall of china’s republic? brainly.com/question/686080

2. Which is a result of island-hopping? brainly.com/question/1254850

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Treaty of Paris

Keywords:

Treaty of Paris, Great Britain, Britain, America, France, Ohio, Ohio River, Mississippi, Territorial gains, Dispute, American Revolution.

You might be interested in
Who was the first president of germany?
jonny [76]
The first president of Germany was Friedrich Ebert
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was Anglo-Saxonism tied to?
Bumek [7]
In its most general form, Anglo-Saxonism extolled the traditions of the English people before the Norman conquest, who were themselves usually understood to be the descendants of old Germanic tribes of northern Europe: a people superior to others by virtue of their cultural possession of ethical values, legal
5 0
3 years ago
The athenian assembly appointed ten generals, who
slamgirl [31]
The answer to your question is c

4 0
3 years ago
Which statements describe the Cherokees' experiences on the Trail of Tears? Check all that apply.
abruzzese [7]

Answer:

A D E

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Would you ever consider going on a strike to defend your rights, even if it meant losing your job? Explain your reasoning.​
liubo4ka [24]

Answer:

Well thank goodness i'm bored and have nothing to do:

Explanation:

Going on strike to defend my rights I believe is more important than my job. I would not only be fighting for the rights of myself, but the rights of others who might be facing the same discrimination in the workplace. If the job does not want me and my beliefs I can find somewhere else to work.

Hope this is what you were looking for.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What do you think accounts for the rise in consumerism in the 1950's?
    7·2 answers
  • What law prompted Stowe to write this book? What was she trying to accomplish with this novel? What does Stowe mean when she wri
    8·1 answer
  • What impact did the Holocaust have on Jewish people?
    13·1 answer
  • What brought an end to the dominance of the Silk Road
    6·2 answers
  • Explain the three main abuses that most distressed Church reformers.
    6·1 answer
  • Great Britain is a <br> but not a republic because a constitutional monarch is head of state.
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement below would an Islamist be most likely to agree with
    10·2 answers
  • What does it mean to “secure the blessings of liberty to…our Posterity”?
    7·1 answer
  • How did many southerners view the north in the mid-1800s
    13·1 answer
  • What were the Native Americans trying to do when they took over Alcatraz?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!