One major difference between low-income children who participated in the high-scope preschool project and those that did not participate was that at the age of 27 years, <u>those who practiced were more likely to be married and own their house</u>.
The Perry Preschool project set up the lasting human and economic price of early life schooling and caused the establishment of the HighScope education studies foundation and one of the first early formative years applications in the u.s. intentionally designed to increase faculty fulfillment for preschool.
Outcomes of the Perry Preschool program consist of: better school fulfillment; extended excessive college graduation prices amongst women; higher employment charges; better profits; and notably decrease crime fees. There were no lasting profits on checks of intellectual performance (IQ exams).
The HighScope educational research foundation research strategies for early formative years of education are primarily based on the methods of the 1962 Perry Preschool observation. It was founded in 1970 with the aid of psychologist David Weikart.
Learn more about the Perry Preschool program here brainly.com/question/25630852
#SPJ4
Answer:
A
Explanation:
A country gains from trade if it specialises in the production of the good for which it has a comparative advantage
A country has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared to other countries. this means that the country can produce the good by forgoing fewer alternative products
For example, country A produces 10kg of beans and 5kg of rice. Country B produces 5kg of beans and 10kg of rice.
for country A,
opportunity cost of producing beans = 5/10 = 0.5
opportunity cost of producing rice = 10/5 = 2
for country B,
opportunity cost of producing rice = 5/10 = 0.5
opportunity cost of producing beans = 10/5 = 2
Country A has a comparative advantage in the production of beans and country B has a comparative advantage in the production of rice
The answer is B . because i said so .
Answer:
Net income decreased by $4,850,000.
Explanation:
Given total overhead applied = $48000000
The actual overhead = $52850000
Over/under Applied overhead = total overhead applied - Actual overhead at the end of the year.
Over / under Applied overhead = 48000000-52850000
Over / under Applied overhead = -$4850000
From the calculation, it can be seen that the overhead is underapplied therefore when under applied overhead allocated to cost of goods sold then cost of goods sold decreased by $4850000.
It’s c I had this problem a week ago
