Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
The answer is "<span>c. proportional representation".
</span><span>Third-party candidates are better off under proportional representation.
Proportional representation voting (PR) is the principle opponent to majority larger part voting. Among advanced western majority rule governments it has turned into the transcendent voting system.The fundamental approach of proportional representation is basic: officials are chosen in multi member areas rather than single-part locale, and the quantity of seats that a gathering wins in a decision is relative to the measure of its help among voters.
</span>
Since frogs don't eat rabbits but they do eat grasshoppers, you should switch the rabbit and grasshopper. :)
The Nina, The Pinta, and The Santa Maria
In comparison to animals such as birds, all humans need to <u>work much harder</u> to gain the acceptance of others in their social group.
<h3>What is a social group?</h3>
This refers to when 2 or more people that interact with one another also share the similar characteristics and collectively have a sense of unity. The groups come in a myriad of sizes and varieties. For instance, a society can be viewed as a large social group.
An acceptance into a social group is an importance aspect as this is an aspect of social behavior that means the degree to which an individual is actively brought into social interactions by others, in individual and or group relationships. the barriers to social acceptance may be prejudice, stigma. A social acceptance exist for people in order to fit in with others, look and act like them: the ability to accept, or to tolerate differences and diversity in other people or groups of people
These social acceptance does effects children, teenagers and adults. It can affect people of all ages with mental disabilities because social acceptance determines many decisions people make in life.
Read more about social acceptance
brainly.com/question/14576193
#SPJ1
