During the cooling off period, underwriters would be allowed to do all of the aforementioned except: b) advertise the issue.
<h3>Who is an
underwriter?</h3>
An underwriter can be defined as an individual or business firm that is saddled with the responsibility of evaluating and assuming another party's financial risk for an agreed amount of money (fee), which is often paid as a spread, commission, interest, or premium.
This ultimately implies that, an underwriter helps a lender (financial institution) in determining the level of risk associated with an issue.
As a general rule, underwriters would be allowed to do all of the following during the cooling off period:
- Take indications of interest.
- Distribute a preliminary prospectus.
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that during the cooling off period, underwriters would only be allowed to do all of the aforementioned except distribute sale or advertise the issue.
Read more on underwriters here: brainly.com/question/28026586
#SPJ1
Answer:
1. False. The peak of 86 MILLION occurred in the year of 1996 and not in 2001 as per the reports of food and agricultural organisation of UN.
2. True. The given statement is correct from the source.
3. False. As per the research conducted on the basis of catch reconstruction, the catches have been declining due top several reasons.
4. The last statement is totally correct as verified by the source mentioned.
Answer:
$120,000
Explanation:
Given that,
stock options = 90,000
Each option can be exercised to acquire one share of $1 par common stock for $12.
Total Value of the option = stock options × fair value of the options
= $90,000 × $5
= $450,000
company to estimate that 10% of the options would be forfeited, so,
= 90% of Total Value of the option
= 0.9 × $450,000
= $405,000
2 out of 3 years = $405,000 × 2/3
= $270,000
= $150,000
Compensation expense (2019) = $270,000 - $150,000
= $120,000
the answer is b:) because high interest rates mean increased cost for all the others since it is not a fixed cost for them
Answer:
a. Firm M probably has a higher dividend payout ratio than Firm N.
Explanation:
The dividend payout ratio is commonly referred to a portion of the net income of the company which is paid to the various shareholders in dividends. Therefore, if we consider the statements made in the question, Firm M has a higher annual net income while the annual net income of Firm N is fluctuating, we can conclude that the dividend payout ratio of Firm M is more than that of Firm N.
