Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the given question is shown below:-
Total Contributions = Monthly contribution + Amount invested in Ferdinand’s 401(k)
= $250 + $125
= $375
1. Future Value = PMT [((1 + r)n - 1) ÷ r
Future value = 375 × ((1 + 0.03 ÷ 12) × 12 × 40 - 1) ÷ (0.03 ÷ 12)
= $347,272
2. Ferdinand deposit = Given Amount × Total number of months in a year × Number of years
= $250 × 12 Months × 40 Years
= $120,000
3. The Amount put in by the employer = 50% of $250 ×Total number of months in a year × Number of years
=
$125 × 12 Months × 40 Years
= $60,000
4. Interest = Future value - Ferdinand deposit - The Amount put in by the employer
= $347,272 - $120,000 - $60,000
= $167,272
We simply applied the above formulas
Answer:
d. Credit to Accounts Receivable.
Explanation:
Hutley Inc. is not going to pay the $8,000 to Searcy, therefore Searcy will make the following entry to write off the balance from Account Receivables.
Debit: Allowance for Doubtful Accounts $8,000
Credit: Accounts Receivables $8,000
To write-off Hutley Inc. receivables.
Answer: The correct answer is c. increase in Discount on Notes Payable for $2,100.
Explanation: 6% of $35,000 for a year is $2,100. From the facts in the question, the Bank deducted the interest in advance, this means the net cash York Construction Company got was $35,000 - 2,100 = $32,900 but note that this does not change the principal amount obligation the Company is obliged to pay the bank, which remains $35,000. What the Company needs to do is to recognize the $35,000 as Notes Payable (Debit Cash and Credit Notes Payable) and recognize a Discount on Notes Payable of $2100 (Debit Discount on Notes Payable and Credit to Cash). Subsequently, based on the 1-year tenor, the Company would unwind the discount to finance charge / interest expense as $2,100 / 12 = $175 monthly (Debit Interest expense; Credit Discount on Notes Payable).
Answer:
quantity demanded; quantity supplied; supply; demand
Explanation:
When there is a change in price of goods, this change will lead to quantity demanded and it will also lead to a change in the quantity supplied. According to the law of demand, an increase in price will lead to a decrease in quantity demanded and vice-versa.
When there is a change in government susidies, this change will lead to a change in supply, and a change in the number of buyers will lead to a change in demand.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
A change in price will lead to a change in quantity demanded and to a change in <em>quantity supplied,</em> while a change in government subsidies will lead to a change in supply and a change in the number of buyers will lead to a change in demand.
