1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Eddi Din [679]
3 years ago
8

Line g passes through points (5, 9) and (3, 2). Line h passes through points (9, 10) and (2, 12). Are line g and line h parallel

or perpendicular?
Mathematics
1 answer:
icang [17]3 years ago
8 0

For this case we find the slopes of each of the lines:

The g line passes through the following points:

(x_ {1}, y_ {1}) :( 3,2)\\(x_ {2}, y_ {2}) :( 5,9)

So, the slope is:

m = \frac {y_ {2} -y_ {1}} {x_ {2} -x_ {1}} = \frac {9-2} {5-3} = \frac {7} {2}

Line h passes through the following points:

(x_ {1}, y_ {1}) :( 9,10)\\(x_ {2}, y_ {2}) :( 2,12)

So, the slope is:

m = \frac {y_ {2} -y_ {1}}{x_ {2} -x_ {1}} = \frac {12-10} {2-9} = \frac {2} {- 7} = - \frac {2} {7}

By definition, if two lines are parallel then their slopes are equal. If the lines are perpendicular then the product of their slopes is -1.

It is observed that lines g and h are not parallel. We verify if they are perpendicular:

\frac {7} {2} * - \frac {2} {7} = \frac {-14} {14} = - 1

Thus, the lines are perpendicular.

Answer:

The lines are perpendicular.

You might be interested in
Solve for w. 4w - 15 = 17 Simplify your answer as much as possible.​
algol [13]
Start of by trying to make 4w the subject of the equation. + 15 to each side making the equations 4w= 15+17, (15+17=32) 4w= 32 meaning that w= 8 because all you do is divide each side of the equation by 4 . HOPE THAT HELPS . if you need more help just shout me
8 0
3 years ago
Use a proof by contradiction to show that the square root of 3 is national You may use the following fact: For any integer kirke
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

1. Let us proof that √3 is an irrational number, using <em>reductio ad absurdum</em>. Assume that \sqrt{3}=\frac{m}{n} where  m and n are non negative integers, and the fraction \frac{m}{n} is irreducible, i.e., the numbers m and n have no common factors.

Now, squaring the equality at the beginning we get that

3=\frac{m^2}{n^2} (1)

which is equivalent to 3n^2=m^2. From this we can deduce that 3 divides the number m^2, and necessarily 3 must divide m. Thus, m=3p, where p is a non negative integer.

Substituting m=3p into (1), we get

3= \frac{9p^2}{n^2}

which is equivalent to

n^2=3p^2.

Thus, 3 divides n^2 and necessarily 3 must divide n. Hence, n=3q where q is a non negative integer.

Notice that

\frac{m}{n} = \frac{3p}{3q} = \frac{p}{q}.

The above equality means that the fraction \frac{m}{n} is reducible, what contradicts our initial assumption. So, \sqrt{3} is irrational.

2. Let us prove now that the multiplication of an integer and a rational number is a rational number. So, r\in\mathbb{Q}, which is equivalent to say that r=\frac{m}{n} where  m and n are non negative integers. Also, assume that k\in\mathbb{Z}. So, we want to prove that k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Z}. Recall that an integer k can be written as

k=\frac{k}{1}.

Then,

k\cdot r = \frac{k}{1}\frac{m}{n} = \frac{mk}{n}.

Notice that the product mk is an integer. Thus, the fraction \frac{mk}{n} is a rational number. Therefore, k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Q}.

3. Let us prove by <em>reductio ad absurdum</em> that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is an irrational number. So, we have x is irrational and p\in\mathbb{Q}.

Write q=x+p and let us suppose that q is a rational number. So, we get that

x=q-p.

But the subtraction or addition of two rational numbers is rational too. Then, the number x must be rational too, which is a clear contradiction with our hypothesis. Therefore, x+p is irrational.

7 0
4 years ago
Write each number in the table to the given place value 95,498
zvonat [6]
8 ones , 9 tens , 4 hundreds , 5 thousands , 9 ten thousands
4 0
3 years ago
Plz plz plz plz help plz no LINKS
Viefleur [7K]
(2.7, 2.3)
(2, 1.7)
(1.7, 1.3)
again may be wrong
5 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP - HELP IS NEEDED ASAP - FOR EVERY SECOND THIS QUESTION ISN'T ANSWERED, YOU LOSE A DAY IN YOUR LIFE - 15 POINTS.
kvv77 [185]

Answer:

The definition of a z-score is:

 

z = (X - μ)/σ where X is our given score (33), μ is the distribution's mean (40) and σ is the distribution's standard deviation (9).

 

To calculate the z-score for 33, plug the numbers in:

 

z = (33 - 40)/9 = -7/9 = -.78

 

Hope this helps!

Step-by-step explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • If 12 cookies cost $2.88, How much would 2 cookies cost?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the midpoint between n(- 4, 4) and (- 2, 2)
    15·1 answer
  • How do you simplify: 12(4b+3)
    8·2 answers
  • Jim ran 200 meters in 30.4 seconds. Mac ran 100 meters in 30.4 seconds. Who ran faster?
    5·2 answers
  • Please help! I'll give brainliest to right answer!
    6·1 answer
  • URGENT WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
    6·1 answer
  • Look at the inequality.
    10·1 answer
  • Question 1/1
    14·1 answer
  • If h(x) = 3 – x, find:<br> c. h(x + 1)<br> d. h(5 - x)
    6·1 answer
  • Solve the absolute value equation.<br><br> 4 − |x| = 1
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!