So that no one group had all the power ( this was one of the many ways the founding fathers ensured a “free country”)
Answer:
The correct answer is:
1. They prevent revenge killing by requiring punishment or compensation for wrongdoing.
Explanation:
The Code of Hammurabi is the first written law in human history, and it is important because it established punishments for certain crimes. That is why both this code and Ten Commandments are important, because they prevented anarchy. For every crime in the Code of Hammurabi you had a certain punishment, very often even a death sentence.
The second one is not correct because it cannot apply to Ten Commandments.
The third one is also not correct because the legal systems for not developed in that period that much.
Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation:
<span>Ancient Egyptian, but it depends on your choice for the this question.</span>
Answer:
It wasn't completely totalitarian as Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler
, and Mussolini compromised with the catholic church making Vatican city a sovereign nation and Roman Catholicism the national religion.
Hope this helped!
